Historical ESWT Paradigms Are Overcome: A Narrative Review

Author:

Lohrer Heinz123ORCID,Nauck Tanja13,Korakakis Vasileios45,Malliaropoulos Nikos36789

Affiliation:

1. European Sportscare Network (ESN), Zentrum für Sportorthopädie, Borsigstrasse 2, 65205 Wiesbaden-Nordenstadt, Germany

2. Institute for Sport and Sport Sciences, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg im Breisgau, Schwarzwaldstraße 175, 79117 Freiburg, Germany

3. European SportsCare, 68 Harley Street, London W1G 7HE, UK

4. Aspetar Orthopaedic and Sports Medicine Hospital, Sport City Street, P.O. Box 29222, Doha, Qatar

5. Institute for Postgraduate Studies in Manual Therapy, 111528 Athens, Greece

6. Thessaloniki Sports and Exercise Medicine Clinic, Asklipiou 17, 54639 Thessaloniki, Greece

7. National Track and Field Centre, Sports Medicine Clinic of S.E.G.A.S., Kautatzoglion Stadion, Agiou Dimitriou 100, 54636 Thessaloniki, Greece

8. Sports Clinic, Rheumatology Department, Barts Health NHS Trust, Bancroft Road, London E1 4DG, UK

9. Centre for Sports and Exercise Medicine, Queen Mary, University of London, Bancroft Road, London E1 4DG, UK

Abstract

Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy (ESWT) is a conservative treatment modality with still growing interest in musculoskeletal disorders. This narrative review aims to present an overview covering 20-year development in the field of musculoskeletal ESWT. Eight historical paradigms have been identified and put under question from a current perspective: energy intensity, focus size, anesthesia, imaging, growth plates, acuteness, calcifications, and number of sessions. All paradigms as set in a historical consensus meeting in 1995 are to be revised. First, modern musculoskeletal ESWT is divided into focused and radial technology and the physical differences are about 100-fold with respect to the applied energy. Most lesions to be treated are easy to reach and clinical focusing plays a major role today. Lesion size is no longer a matter of concern. With the exception of nonunion fractures full, regional, or even local anesthesia is not helpful in musculoskeletal indications. Juvenile patients can also effectively be treated without risk of epiphyseal damage. Further research is needed to answer the question about if and which acute injuries can be managed effectively. Treatment parameters like the number of sessions are still relying on empirical data and have to be further elucidated.

Publisher

Hindawi Limited

Subject

General Immunology and Microbiology,General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology,General Medicine

Cited by 34 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3