Affiliation:
1. Institute of Safety, Environment Protection and Technical Supervision, Petro China Southwest Oil & Gas Field Company, Chengdu 610041, China
2. Pipeline Management Department, Petro China Southwest Oil & Gas Field Company, Chengdu 610041, China
3. Dean’s Office, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610500, China
4. School of Civil Engineering and Geomatics, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610500, China
Abstract
Material defects and external environmental factors increase the engineering safety risks of buried PE pipelines in service. This paper mainly reviews the failure mode and the prevention and control technology of buried PE pipelines in service, as well as comparative failure characteristics between the buried PE and steel pipelines. The main failure factors of buried PE pipelines can be divided into four levels: the first level is third-party damage; the second level includes three failure factors, i.e., surface subsidence, joint failure, and aging failure; the third level consists of pipe piercing, crack development, and pipeline defect; the fourth level is a corrosion failure. Besides, steel and PE pipelines have various physical and mechanical properties, which lead to a significant difference in the service performance and degradation mechanism in practice. For instance, corrosion and welded joint leakage are the two common problems in steel pipelines during the service period, while PE pipelines have excellent corrosion resistance. Additionally, in order to ensure and maintain the long-term operations of PE pipelines, it is of great significance to develop and promote nonexcavation technologies of construction, renewal, and repair for natural gas-buried PE pipelines. Furthermore, based on the above studies, some further research studies on buried PE pipelines in service are suggested and discussed, e.g., (a) the service performance and degradation mechanism of buried PE pipelines in complicated environmental conditions, (b) the interaction mechanism among the engineering structure, PE pipelines, and geological environment, as well as PE pipeline geological soils coupled in multiple physical fields, and (c) the combinations of the traditional engineering risk assessment method and the numerical analysis method considering the interaction between the PE pipeline and geological environment. The results could be helpful for a better understanding of the operation conditions of buried PE pipelines, and it is also hoped that this study could provide guidance for the safe operation, maintenance, and integrity management of buried PE pipelines.
Funder
Science and Technology Project of PetroChina Southwest Oil and Gas Field Company
Subject
Civil and Structural Engineering
Reference50 articles.
1. Current status and development trend of oil and gas storage and transportation technologies;L. Wang;Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation,2021
2. New progress in China’s oil and gas pipeline construction in 2019;P. Gao;International Petroleum Economics,2021
3. Modelling and parametric study of a gasketed bell and spigot joint in a buried high density polyethylene pipeline;D. B. García;Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology,2020
4. Numerical–Experimental Analysis of Polyethylene Pipe Deformation at Different Load Values
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献