Translation, Cross-Cultural Adaptation, and Psychometric Validation of the Chinese/Mandarin Cardiac Rehabilitation Barriers Scale (CRBS-C/M)

Author:

Liu Xia1,Fowokan Adeleke2,Grace Sherry L.23ORCID,Ding Biao4,Meng Shu5,Chen Xiu5,Xia Yinghua5,Zhang Yaqing1

Affiliation:

1. Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Nursing, Shanghai, China

2. KITE & Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

3. Faculty of Health, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

4. Shanghai Sixth People’s Hospital, Shanghai, China

5. Xinhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China

Abstract

Objective. Cardiovascular diseases are among the leading causes of morbidity in China and around the world. Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) effectively mitigates this burden; however, utilization is low. CR barriers in China have not been well characterized; this study sought to translate, cross-culturally adapt, and psychometrically validate the CR Barriers Scale in Chinese/Mandarin (CRBS-C/M). Methods. Independent translations of the 21-item CRBS were conducted by two bilingual health professionals, followed by back-translation. A Delphi process was undertaken with five experts to consider the semantics and cross-cultural relevance of the items. Following finalization, 380 cardiac patients from 11 hospitals in Shanghai were administered a validation survey including the translated CRBS. Following exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, internal consistency was assessed. Validity was tested through assessing the association of the CRBS-C/M with the CR Information Awareness Questionnaire. Results. Items were refined and finalized. Factor analysis of CRBS-C/M ( Kaiser Meyer Olkin = 0.867 , Bartlett’s test p < 0.001 ) revealed five factors: perceived CR need, external logistical factors, time conflicts, program and health system-level factors, and comorbidities/lack of vitality; Cronbach’s alpha ( α ) of the subscales ranged from 0.67 to 0.82. The mean total CRBS score was significantly lower in patients who participated in CR compared with those who did not, demonstrating criterion validity ( 2.35 ± 0.71 vs. 3.08 ± 0.55 ; p < 0.001 ). Construct validity was supported by the significant associations between total CRBS scores and CR awareness, sex, living situation, city size, income, diagnosis/procedure, disease severity, and several risk factors (all p < 0.05 ). Conclusions. CRBS-C/M is reliable and valid, so barriers can be identified and mitigated in Mandarin-speaking patients.

Publisher

Hindawi Limited

Subject

Rehabilitation,Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Reference46 articles.

1. The Global Burden of Cardiovascular Diseases and Risk Factors

2. A review of the cost of cardiovascular disease

3. Global and Regional Patterns in Cardiovascular Mortality From 1990 to 2013

4. World Health OrganizationAlwanA.Burden: mortality, morbidity and risk factorsGlobal Status Report on Non-communicable Diseases 20102010GenevaWorld Health Organization

5. Burden of Cardiovascular Diseases in China, 1990-2016

全球学者库

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"全球学者库"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前全球学者库共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2023 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3