Detection and Significance of Cell-Free DNA Mutation in Pleural Effusion in Patients with Advanced NSCLC

Abstract

Objective. To detect EGFR/KRAS genes in pleural effusion cell-free DNA in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and to explore the clinical significance of EGFR/KRAS mutation status in pleural effusion. Methods. A retrospective collection was performed on the specimens of pleural effusion and matched tissues from 50 patients with advanced NSCLC admitted to the hospital between January 2019 and January 2021. DNA mutation status of EGFR/KRAS in different specimens was detected and compared by pyrosequencing. The clinicopathological data and follow-up data of survival were collected. The relationship between DNA mutation and clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis was analyzed. Results. In the 50 pleural effusion specimens, there were 22 cases (44.00%) with EGFR mutations (19/21 exon mutations), including 12 cases with EGFR19 deletion mutation and 10 cases with EGFR21 exon L858R mutation. There were 6 cases (12.00%) with KRAS mutations (single-base substitution mutations), including 4 cases with 12-codon mutation and 2 cases with 13-codon mutation. In the 50 tissue specimens, there were 24 cases (48.00%) with EGFR mutations and 4 cases (8.00%) with KRAS mutations. There was no significant difference between pleural effusion specimens and tissue specimens, with good consistency (kappa = 0.920–0.779, $P>0.05$ ). EGFR mutation in pleural effusion was related to smoking history, types of pathological tissues, and lymph node metastasis ( $P<0.05$ ). The incidence of EGFR mutation was higher in nonsmokers, patients with lung adenocarcinoma, and patients with lymph node metastasis. The carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) in patients with EGFR mutation was higher than that with wild-type EGFR, while the level of cytokeratin 19 fragment (Cy21-1) was lower than that with wild-type EGFR ( $P<0.05$ ). The 1-year overall survival rate in the EGFR mutation group was significantly higher than that in the EGFR wild group (68.18% vs. 42.86%) (HR = 0.419, 95% CI = 0.178–0.989, and $P<0.001$ ). Conclusion. For the detection of EGFR gene mutation, the results of the pleural effusion specimens and the tumor pathological tissue specimens were well consistent and the detection of pleural effusion could be used as an alternative method when tissue specimens cannot be obtained. EGFR gene mutations are present in majority in patients with advanced NSCLC. The incidence of EGFR mutation is higher in nonsmokers, patients with lung adenocarcinoma, those with lymph node metastasis, those with high-expression CEA, and those with low-expression Cy21-1. The prognosis is better in patients with EGFR mutation.