Evaluation of the Definitions of “High-Risk” Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma Using the American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging Criteria and National Comprehensive Cancer Network Guidelines

Author:

Chu Melinda B.1,Slutsky Jordan B.2,Dhandha Maulik M.1,Beal Brandon T.3,Armbrecht Eric S.4,Walker Ronald J.5,Varvares Mark A.5,Fosko Scott W.1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Dermatology, Saint Louis University, 1402 S. Grand Boulevard, 4th Floor, St. Louis, MO 63104, USA

2. Stony Brook School of Medicine, Department of Dermatology, 181 N. Belle Mead Road, Suite 5, East Setauket, NY 11733, USA

3. School of Medicine, Saint Louis University, 1402 S. Grand Boulevard, St. Louis, MO 63104, USA

4. Center for Outcomes Research, Saint Louis University, 3545 Lafayette Avenue, 4th Floor, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA

5. Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Saint Louis University, 3635 Vista Avenue, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA

Abstract

Recent guidelines from the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) and National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) have been proposed for the assessment of “high-risk” cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas (cSCCs). Though different in perspective, both guidelines share the common goals of trying to identify “high-risk” cSCCs and improving patient outcomes. Thus, in theory, both definitions should identify a similar proportion of “high-risk” tumors. We sought to evaluate the AJCC and NCCN definitions of “high-risk” cSCCs and to assess their concordance.Methods. A retrospective review of head and neck cSCCs seen by an academic dermatology department from July 2010 to November 2011 was performed.Results. By AJCC criteria, most tumors (n=211,82.1%) were of Stage 1; 46 tumors (13.9%) were of Stage 2. Almost all were of Stage 2 due to size alone (≥2 cm); one tumor was “upstaged” due to “high-risk features.” Using the NCCN taxonomy, 231 (87%) of tumors were “high-risk.”Discussion. This analysis demonstrates discordance between AJCC and NCCN definitions of “high-risk” cSCC. Few cSCCs are of Stage 2 by AJCC criteria, while most are “high-risk” by the NCCN guidelines. While the current guidelines represent significant progress, further studies are needed to generate a unified definition of “high-risk” cSCC to optimize management.

Publisher

Hindawi Limited

Subject

Dermatology,Oncology

Cited by 42 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3