Efficacy and Tolerability of Two Different Low-Volume Split-Dose Polyethylene Glycol Electrolytes Solution Bowel Preparation for Morning Colonoscopy

Author:

Tian Hefeng1ORCID,Li Hui1ORCID,Zhu Xuanrui1ORCID,Liu Wenlong1ORCID,Fan Ying1ORCID,Shi Lei1ORCID,Wang Xiu1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, China

Abstract

Object. The study compared the efficacy and tolerability of two different low-volume split-dose polyethylene glycol electrolytes solution (PEG-ELS) bowel preparation for morning colonoscopy. Methods. A total of 120 patients were randomized to receive either the control group (n = 64) or the experimental group (n = 65). Patients in the control group adopted the low-volume split-dose regimen one, and patients in the experimental group adopted the low-volume split-dose regimen two. Those randomized to regimen one were instructed to take 0.75 L PEG two hours after dinner the day before the colonoscopy and 1.5 L PEG 4 hours before the colonoscopy. Patients assigned to regimen two were invited to consume 1.5 L PEG two hours after dinner the day before the colonoscopy and 0.75 L PEG 4 hours before the colonoscopy. The quality of bowel preparation, rated according to a Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS), represented the primary outcome measure. Tolerability, satisfaction, and lesions detection rated were secondary outcomes. Results. There was no significant difference between the transverse colon and right colon scores between the two groups ( P > 0.05 ). The low-volume split-dose regimen two showed a higher success rate for cleansing of the right colon and overall colon ( P < 0.05 ). For the comparison of the patients’ bowel tolerance, there were no statistical differences between the two groups regarding thirst, abdominal pain or abdominal discomfort, abdominal distension, dizziness or headache, anal discomfort, and sleep disturbance ( P > 0.05 ). However, regimen two had significantly less nausea, vomiting, and fatigue than regimen one (24.62% vs. 42.19%, P = 0.034 ; 10.77% vs. 25.00%, P = 0.035 ; 6.15% vs. 21.88%, P = 0.010 , respectively). Patient-reported satisfaction and willingness to repeat the bowel preparation were significantly higher for low-volume split-dose regimen two than for low-volume split-dose regimen one ( P = 0.011 ; P = 0.015 ). Conclusions. In early morning colonoscopies, the bowel-cleansing efficacy and patient tolerability of low-volume split-dose regimen two were superior to low-volume split-dose regimen one.

Publisher

Hindawi Limited

Subject

Gastroenterology,Hepatology,General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3