Cytotoxic Activity Methods

Author:

Emerce Esra1,Taban Akça Kevser2

Affiliation:

1. Department of Pharmaceutical Toxicology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Gazi University, Ankara, Türkiye

2. Department of Pharmacognosy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Gazi University, Ankara, Türkiye

Abstract

Natural products have formed the basis of traditional medicine systems throughout human history. Today, drug discovery studies from natural origins continue rapidly and efficiently with modern methods. Among the many activities, cytotoxic activity is related to the behaviour of test material on cell viability and cellular growth. Cytotoxicity methods, used as a screening test or initial test for guiding other activities, provide useful information for biocompatibility studies for medical devices or materials, drug discovery and development processes, toxicity evaluation of cosmetics, research of disease mechanisms and treatments, and determination of chemopreventive agents. In vitro cytotoxicity analyses have emerged as an alternative to in vivo studies and have become preferable due to their ease of application, standardization, rapid, low cost, and compatibility with data from in vivo studies. With cell-based cytotoxicity studies, basic information about the cytostatic and cytotoxic effects of the tested substance is obtained. In studies dealing with natural products, the most appropriate cytotoxic method should be selected according to the properties and chemical structures of natural compounds, the ultimate goal of the study, cell types, etc. Although there are many cytotoxicity methods, this chapter is an introductory overview of the most commonly used assay methods to estimate the cytotoxic activity in natural products.

Publisher

BENTHAM SCIENCE PUBLISHERS

Reference97 articles.

1. Hotchkiss R.S.; Strasser A.; McDunn J.E.; Swanson P.E.; Cell death. N Engl J Med 2009,361(16),1570-1583

2. Galluzzi L.; Maiuri M.C.; Vitale I.; Zischka H.; Castedo M.; Zitvogel L.; Kroemer G.; Cell death modalities: Classification and pathophysiological implications. Cell Death Differ 2007,14(7),1237-1243

3. Galluzzi L.; Vitale I.; Aaronson S.A.; Abrams, J.M.; Adam, D.; Agostinis, P.; Alnemri, E.S.; Altucci, L.; Amelio, I.; Andrews, D.W.; Annicchiarico-Petruzzelli, M.; Antonov, A.V.; Arama, E.; Baehrecke, E.H.; Barlev, N.A.; Bazan, N.G.; Bernassola, F.; Bertrand, M.J.M.; Bianchi, K.; Blagosklonny, M.V.; Blomgren, K.; Borner, C.; Boya, P.; Brenner, C.; Campanella, M.; Candi, E.; Carmona-Gutierrez, D.; Cecconi, F.; Chan, F.K.M.; Chandel, N.S.; Cheng, E.H.; Chipuk, J.E.; Cidlowski, J.A.; Ciechanover, A.; Cohen, G.M.; Conrad, M.; Cubillos-Ruiz, J.R.; Czabotar, P.E.; D’Angiolella, V.; Dawson, T.M.; Dawson, V.L.; De Laurenzi, V.; De Maria, R.; Debatin, K.M.; DeBerardinis, R.J.; Deshmukh, M.; Di Daniele, N.; Di Virgilio, F.; Dixit, V.M.; Dixon, S.J.; Duckett, C.S.; Dynlacht, B.D.; El-Deiry, W.S.; Elrod, J.W.; Fimia, G.M.; Fulda, S.; García-Sáez, A.J.; Garg, A.D.; Garrido, C.; Gavathiotis, E.; Golstein, P.; Gottlieb, E.; Green, D.R.; Greene, L.A.; Gronemeyer, H.; Gross, A.; Hajnoczky, G.; Hardwick, J.M.; Harris, I.S.; Hengartner, M.O.; Hetz, C.; Ichijo, H.; Jäättelä, M.; Joseph, B.; Jost, P.J.; Juin, P.P.; Kaiser, W.J.; Karin, M.; Kaufmann, T.; Kepp, O.; Kimchi, A.; Kitsis, R.N.; Klionsky, D.J.; Knight, R.A.; Kumar, S.; Lee, S.W.; Lemasters, J.J.; Levine, B.; Linkermann, A.; Lipton, S.A.; Lockshin, R.A.; López-Otín, C.; Lowe, S.W.; Luedde, T.; Lugli, E.; MacFarlane, M.; Madeo, F.; Malewicz, M.; Malorni, W.; Manic, G.; Marine, J.C.; Martin, S.J.; Martinou, J.C.; Medema, J.P.; Mehlen, P.; Meier, P.; Melino, S.; Miao, E.A.; Molkentin, J.D.; Moll, U.M.; Muñoz-Pinedo, C.; Nagata, S.; Nuñez, G.; Oberst, A.; Oren, M.; Overholtzer, M.; Pagano, M.; Panaretakis, T.; Pasparakis, M.; Penninger, J.M.; Pereira, D.M.; Pervaiz, S.; Peter, M.E.; Piacentini, M.; Pinton, P.; Prehn, J.H.M.; Puthalakath, H.; Rabinovich, G.A.; Rehm, M.; Rizzuto, R.; Rodrigues, C.M.P.; Rubinsztein, D.C.; Rudel, T.; Ryan, K.M.; Sayan, E.; Scorrano, L.; Shao, F.; Shi, Y.; Silke, J.; Simon, H.U.; Sistigu, A.; Stockwell, B.R.; Strasser, A.; Szabadkai, G.; Tait, S.W.G.; Tang, D.; Tavernarakis, N.; Thorburn, A.; Tsujimoto, Y.; Turk, B.; Vanden Berghe, T.; Vandenabeele, P.; Vander Heiden, M.G.; Villunger, A.; Virgin, H.W.; Vousden, K.H.; Vucic, D.; Wagner, E.F.; Walczak, H.; Wallach, D.; Wang, Y.; Wells, J.A.; Wood, W.; Yuan, J.; Zakeri, Z.; Zhivotovsky, B.; Zitvogel, L.; Melino, G.; Kroemer, G. Molecular mechanisms of cell death: Recommendations of the Nomenclature Committee on Cell Death 2018. Cell Death Differ 2018,25(3),486-541

4. Elmore S.; Apoptosis: A review of programmed cell death. Toxicol Pathol 2007,35(4),495-516

5. Mughal W.; Kirshenbaum L.A.; Cell death signalling mechanisms in heart failure. Exp Clin Cardiol 2011,16(4),102-108

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3