Comparison of the sedative effect of ketamine, magnesium sulfate, and propofol in patients undergoing upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: Double-blinded randomized clinical trial

Author:

Ahmadpour Sajjad1ORCID,Saeidi Mohammad2ORCID,Shafiee Hamed3ORCID,Riahipour Farahnaz3,Hormati Ahmad14ORCID,Habibi Mohammad Amin5,Vahedian Mostafa6ORCID,Aminnejad Reza27ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Gastroenterology and Hepatology Diseases Research Center, Qom University of Medical Sciences, Qom, Iran

2. Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Shahid Beheshti Hospital, Qom University of Medical Sciences, Qom, Iran

3. Department of Anesthesiology and Critical care, Qom University of Medical Sciences, Qom, Iran

4. Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases Research Center, Colorectal Research Center, Hazrat-e Rasool General Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

5. Iranian tissue bank and research center, Tehran University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran

6. Department of Family and Community Medicine, School of Medicine, Qom University of Medical Sciences, Qom, Iran

7. Anesthesiology Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Background: Endoscopy provides valuable diagnostic informationand intervention therapies for gastroenterologists. Therefore, various drugs have been used to induce sedation in patients undergoing endoscopy, whereas none have been considered definitely preferred by endoscopists. In the current study, we decided to use the combination of magnesium sulfate, ketamine, and their synergistic effects for creating partial analgesia to increase the satisfaction of endoscopists and patients. Methods: This study is a Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial that investigates the sedative effect of ketamine, magnesium sulfate, and propofol in endoscopy. Patients were selected from individuals over 12 years old and with American Society of Anesthesia (ASA) physical status I or II. The study was performed on 210 patients classified as ASA (I have no underlying disease) or II (with underlying controlled disease). The whole group was relieved of pain during injection, sedation according to Ramsay criteria, satisfaction with the operation, duration, recovery, nausea and vomiting, hypotension, and decreased oxygen saturation were compared. Results: A total of 155 patients were enrolled in our study, including 51 patients (midazolam and propofol), 55 patients (midazolam and ketamine), and 49 patients (midazolam and ketamine and magnesium). The results showed that preoperative heart rate, intraoperative systolic blood pressure, intraoperative diastolic blood pressure, postoperative heart rate, postoperative systolic blood pressure, and postoperative heart rate were significantly different between the groups. Conclusion: The satisfaction of the endoscopic was achieved to a great extent, mainly in the group receiving midazolam and propofol and in the group receiving midazolam and ketamine. In most cases, the satisfaction of the endoscopic was acceptable, and the low satisfaction of the endoscopic was more in the group receiving midazolam. Ketamine and magnesium were observed. The two compounds midazolam-ketamine, and midazolam-propofol, have a more favorable effect than the combination of midazolam, ketamine, and magnesium.

Publisher

Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.

Subject

Pharmacology,General Neuroscience

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3