Coronary Bifurcation Stenting: Review of Current Techniques and Evidence

Author:

Kanmanthareddy Arun123ORCID,Aedma Surya Kiran4,Naik Anant5

Affiliation:

1. College of Public Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, 68198, USA

2. CHI Health Heart Institute, Omaha, Nebraska, 68124, USA

3. Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, Nebraska, 68124, USA

4. Department of Internal Medicine, Carle Foundation Hospital, Urbana, Illinois, 61801, USA

5. Carle Illinois College of Medicine, University of Illinois Urbana Champaign, Champaign, Illinois, 61820, USA

Abstract

Background: Coronary bifurcation stenting constitutes 20% of all PCI performed. Given the extensive prevalence of bifurcation lesions, various techniques have sought to optimally stent the bifurcation to improve revascularization while also decreasing rates of stent thrombosis and lesion recurrence. Advanced techniques, such as planned two-stent approaches, have been shown to have improved outcomes but also require fluoroscopy and procedure time, posing an economic argument as well as a patient-outcome one. Objective: Because of the many strategies posited in the literature, it becomes essential to objectively evaluate evidence from randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses to help determine the optimal stenting strategy. Methods: We reviewed the clinical evidence on the efficacy of coronary bifurcation stenting. Results: In this paper, we review the most recent randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses on the efficacy of various stenting techniques and advances in stenting technologies published to gauge the current state of understanding and chart where the field is heading. Conclusion: Bifurcation stenting is a maturing problem in the field of interventional cardiology that is adapting to the needs of the patients and advances in technology.

Publisher

Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3