Perception of Pain Intensity and Quality in Patients Treated with Conventional Fixed Orthodontic Appliances Versus Clear Removable Aligners: A Pilot Study

Author:

Alturki Ghassan,Jamel Ahmad,Alshuaybi Abdullah,Baeshen Hosam,Farag Arwa M.

Abstract

Objectives The main objective of this study was to compare the perception of pain intensity between patients treated with fixed orthodontic appliances and those treated with clear removable aligners. The secondary objective was to investigate the pattern and quantities of analgesics use immediately after orthodontic adjustment visits and correlate this with the intensity and quality of the perceived pain. Methods Two hundred participants, 100 treated with fixed orthodontic appliances (G1) and 100 with clear removable aligners (G2), filled the Short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ), the Numeric Pain Rating scale (NPRS), and the Present Pain Index (PPI) at baseline (before orthodontic adjustment or changing to a new aligner) and 24-hours post-adjustment visit. Results The mean change in the NPRS values from baseline to 24-hour post-adjustment showed significantly higher pain intensity in G1 (3.15±2.47) compared to G2 (1.58±1.74) (p<0.0001). There was also a statistically significant difference in the frequency of reporting of SF-MPQ pain descriptors between G1 and G2, with more pain associated with G1. The PPI 24-hours post-adjustment showed that 94% of G1 reported some form of pain compared to only 79% in G2. At the 24-hour post-adjustment visit, 34 participants in G1 and only 8 participants in G2 reported the use of analgesic medications (p<0.0001). Conclusion Overall, patients treated with fixed orthodontic appliances reported higher pain perception compared to patients treated with clear removable aligners during the first 24 hours following the adjustment visit.

Publisher

Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3