Ultra-low wear rates for rigid-on-rigid bearings in total hip replacements

Abstract

With the increased clinical interest in metal-on-metal and ceramic-on-ceramic total-hip replacements (THRs), the objective of this hip simulator study was to identify the relative wear ranking of three bearing systems, namely CoCr-polyethylene (M-PE), CoCr-CoCr (M-M) and ceramic-on-ceramic (C-C). Volumetric wear rates were used as the method of comparison. The seven THR groupings included one M-PE study, two M-M studies and four C-C studies. Special emphasis was given to defining the ‘run-in’ phase of accelerated wear that rigid-on-rigid bearings generally exhibit. The hypothesis was that characterization of the run-in and steady state wear phases would clarify not only the tribological performance in vitro but also help correlate these in vitro wear rates with the ‘average’ wear rates measured on retrieved implants. The implant systems were studied on multichannel hip simulators using the Paul gait cycle and bovine serum as the lubricant. With 28 mm CoCr heads, the PE (2.5 Mrad/N2) wear rates averaged 13 mm3/106 cycles duration. This was considered a low value compared with the clinical model of 74 mm3/year (for 28 mm heads). Our later studies established that this low laboratory value was a consequence of the serum parameters then in use. The mating CoCr heads (with PE cups) wore at the steady state rate of 0.028 mm3/106 cycles. The concurrently run Metasul™ M-M THRs wore at the steady state rate of 0.119 mm3/106 cycles with high-protein serum. In the second Metasul M-M study with low-protein serum, the THR run-in rate was 2.681 mm3/106 cycles and steady state was 0.977 mm3/106 cycles. At 10 years, these data would predict a 70-fold reduction in M-M wear debris compared with the clinical PE wear model. All M-M implants exhibited biphasic wear trends, with the transition point at 0.5 × 106 cycles between run-in and steady state phases, the latter averaging a 3-fold decrease in wear rate. White surface coatings on implants (coming from the serum solution) were a confounding factor but did not obscure the two orders of magnitude wear performance improvement for CoCr over PE cups. The liners in the alumina head-alumina cup combination wore at the steady state rate of 0.004 mm3/106 cycles over 14 × 106 cycles duration (high-protein serum). The zirconia head-alumina cup THR combination wore at 0.174 and 0.014 mm3/106 cycles for run-in and steady state rates respectively (low-protein serum). The zirconia head and cup THR combination wore slightly higher initially with 0.342 and 0.013 mm3/106 cycles for run-in and steady state rates respectively. Other wear studies have generally predicted catastrophic wear for such zirconia-ceramic combinations. It was noted that the zirconia wear trends were frequently masked by the effects of tenacious white surface coatings. It was possible that these coatings protected the zirconia surfaces somewhat in this simulator study. The experimental ceramic Crystaloy THR had the highest ceramic run-in wear at 0.681 mm3/106 cycles and typical 0.016 mm3/106 cycles for steady state. Since these implants represented the first Crystaloy THR sets made, it was likely that the surface conditions of this high-strength ceramic could be improved in the future. Overall, the ceramic THRs demonstrated three orders of magnitude wear performance improvement over PE cups. With zirconia implants, while the cup wear was sometimes measurable, head wear was seldom discernible, Therefore, we have to be cautious in interpreting such zirconia wear data. Identifying the run=in and steady state wear rates was a valuable step in processing the ceramic wear data and assessing its reliability. Thus, The M-M and C-C THRs have demonstrated two to three orders of reduction in volumetric wear in the laboratory compared with the PE wear standard, which helps to explain the excellent wear performance and minimal osteolysis seen with such implants at retrieval operations.