LICHTENSTEIN, TAPP, AND TEP: COMPARATIVE ASSESSMENT OF POSTOPERATIVE PAIN INTENSITY

Author:

Bulyk I. I.,Shkaraban V. P.,Vasyliuk S. M.,Huculiak S. M.,Hudyvok V. S.,Osadets V. S.,Ivanyna V. V.

Abstract

Summary. One of the indicators of choosing a method of inguinal hernia repair is the intensity of the pain syndrome. Intense postoperative pain causes discomfort in the patient, prolongs the period of physical rehabilitation and the patient’s stay in the hospital. The aim of the study. To evaluate the intensity of postoperative pain syndrome in patients who used different methods of inguinal hernia repair: Lichtenstein, TAPP and TEP. Research materials and methods. We performed inguinal hernia repair in 211 patients. Lichtenstein repair was performed in 65 of them (Lichtenstein group), TAPP in 81 patients (TAPP group), and TEP in 65 (TEP group). Hernia repair was carried out according to generally accepted techniques described in the literature. The patients of all groups had a standard analgesia scheme. The pain syndrome was assessed using the Visual Analogue psychometric scale. Research results and their discussion. In the Lichtenstein group, the pain index on the first postoperative day was 5.09±1.66. On the third day, it decreased significantly (p<0.05) (r=0.28) and was 1.76±1.01. In the TAPP group, on the first postoperative day, patients rated their pain syndrome as 5.17±1.67. From the third postoperative day, the pain index decreased significantly (p<0.001) (r=0.42) and was 1.80±0.85. In the TEP group, there was a decrease in the pain syndrome index from 5.67±1.58 on the first postoperative day to 2.38±0.84 (3 days), but it was not reliable and had a weak correlation. Conclusions. On the first postoperative day, the most uncomfortable procedure was the TEP technique. The VAS score in this group was improbably the highest compared to the Lichtenstein and TAPP groups. On the third postoperative day, there was a probable decrease in pain syndrome in the Lichtenstein and TAPP groups, and an improbable decrease in the TEP group.

Publisher

Institute of General and Emergency Surgery Named after V.T. Zaitsev NAMS of Ukraine

Subject

General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3