Transparency, Fairness, Data Protection, Neutrality

Author:

Abiteboul Serge1,Stoyanovich Julia2

Affiliation:

1. Inria 8 Ecole Normale Supérieure, Paris, France

2. New York University, Brooklyn, NY, USA

Abstract

The data revolution continues to transform every sector of science, industry, and government. Due to the incredible impact of data-driven technology on society, we are becoming increasingly aware of the imperative to use data and algorithms responsibly—in accordance with laws and ethical norms. In this article, we discuss three recent regulatory frameworks: the European Union’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), the New York City Automated Decisions Systems (ADS) Law, and the Net Neutrality principle, which aim to protect the rights of individuals who are impacted by data collection and analysis. These frameworks are prominent examples of a global trend: Governments are starting to recognize the need to regulate data-driven algorithmic technology. Our goal in this article is to bring these regulatory frameworks to the attention of the data management community and to underscore the technical challenges they raise and that we, as a community, are well-equipped to address. The main takeaway of this article is that legal and ethical norms cannot be incorporated into data-driven systems as an afterthought. Rather, we must think in terms of responsibility by design, viewing it as a systems requirement.

Funder

Agence Nationale de la Recherche

National Science Foundation

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)

Subject

Information Systems and Management,Information Systems

Reference32 articles.

1. Data Profiling

2. Managing your digital life

3. Julia Angwin Jeff Larson Surya Mattu and Lauren Kirchner. 2016. Machine bias: Risk assessments in criminal sentencing. ProPublica (May 2016). Retrieved from https://www.propublica.org/article/machine-bias-risk-assessments-in-criminal-sentencing. Julia Angwin Jeff Larson Surya Mattu and Lauren Kirchner. 2016. Machine bias: Risk assessments in criminal sentencing. ProPublica (May 2016). Retrieved from https://www.propublica.org/article/machine-bias-risk-assessments-in-criminal-sentencing.

4. Alexandra Chouldechova. 2017. Fair prediction with disparate impact: A study of bias in recidivism prediction instruments. Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/abs/1703.00056. Alexandra Chouldechova. 2017. Fair prediction with disparate impact: A study of bias in recidivism prediction instruments. Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/abs/1703.00056.

5. Danielle K. Citron and Frank A. Pasquale. 2014. The scored society: Due process for automated predictions. Washington Law Rev. 89 (2014). Retrieved from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2376209. Danielle K. Citron and Frank A. Pasquale. 2014. The scored society: Due process for automated predictions. Washington Law Rev. 89 (2014). Retrieved from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2376209.

Cited by 34 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. A CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK FOR THE GOVERNMENT BIG DATA ECOSYSTEM (‘datagov.eco’);Data & Knowledge Engineering;2024-09

2. Incremental federated learning for traffic flow classification in heterogeneous data scenarios;Neural Computing and Applications;2024-08-12

3. Regulation by Design: Features, Practices, Limitations, and Governance Implications;Minds and Machines;2024-05-17

4. Future Trends in Data Analytics;Advances in Systems Analysis, Software Engineering, and High Performance Computing;2024-05-14

5. DMPFrame: A Conceptual Metadata Framework for Data Management Plans;Journal of Library Metadata;2023-10-02

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3