Affiliation:
1. Cornell University, Ithaca, USA
Abstract
Four major factors govern the intricacies of community extraction in networks: (1) the literature offers a multitude of disparate community detection algorithms whose output exhibits high structural variability across the collection, (2) communities identified by algorithms may differ structurally from real communities that arise in practice, (3) there is no consensus characterizing how to discriminate communities from noncommunities, and (4) the application domain includes a wide variety of networks of fundamentally different natures. In this article, we present a class separability framework to tackle these challenges through a comprehensive analysis of community properties. Our approach enables the assessment of the structural dissimilarity among the output of multiple community detection algorithms and between the output of algorithms and communities that arise in practice. In addition, our method provides us with a way to organize the vast collection of community detection algorithms by grouping those that behave similarly. Finally, we identify the most discriminative graph-theoretical properties of community signature and the small subset of properties that account for most of the biases of the different community detection algorithms. We illustrate our approach with an experimental analysis, which reveals nuances of the structure of real and extracted communities. In our experiments, we furnish our framework with the output of 10 different community detection procedures, representative of categories of popular algorithms available in the literature, applied to a diverse collection of large-scale real network datasets whose domains span biology, online shopping, and social systems. We also analyze communities identified by annotations that accompany the data, which reflect exemplar communities in various domain. We characterize these communities using a broad spectrum of community properties to produce the different structural classes. As our experiments show that community structure is not a universal concept, our framework enables an informed choice of the most suitable community detection method for identifying communities of a specific type in a given network and allows for a comparison of existing community detection algorithms while guiding the design of new ones.
Funder
Google
Microsoft Research
Air Force Office of Scientific Research
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
Cited by
15 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Triangle-aware Spectral Sparsifiers and Community Detection;Proceedings of the 27th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining;2021-08-14
2. Overlapping community detection by constrained personalized PageRank;Expert Systems with Applications;2021-07
3. An Efficient Method Based on Label Propagation for Overlapping Community Detection;2021 IEEE 24th International Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work in Design (CSCWD);2021-05-05
4. Big networks: A survey;Computer Science Review;2020-08
5. Overlapping Community Detection in Bipartite Networks using a Micro-bipartite Network Model: Bi-EgoNet;Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems;2019-12-23