ReCRec: Reasoning the Causes of Implicit Feedback for Debiased Recommendation

Author:

Lin Siyi1ORCID,Zhou Sheng2ORCID,Chen Jiawei3ORCID,Feng Yan4ORCID,Shi Qihao5ORCID,Chen Chun4ORCID,Li Ying6ORCID,Wang Can3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. College of Computer Science, Zhejiang University, China

2. School of Software Technology, Zhejiang University, China

3. State Key Laboratory of Blockchain and Data Security, Zhejiang University, China and Hangzhou High-Tech Zone (Binjiang) Institute of Blockchain and Data Security, China

4. State Key Laboratory of Blockchain and Data Security, Zhejiang University, China and College of Computer Science, Zhejiang University, China

5. Zhejiang University, China

6. Bangsun Technology, China

Abstract

Implicit feedback ( e.g ., user clicks) is widely used in building recommender systems (RS). However, the inherent notorious exposure bias significantly affects recommendation performance. Exposure bias refers a phenomenon that implicit feedback is influenced by user exposure, and does not precisely reflect user preference. Current methods for addressing exposure bias primarily reduce confidence in unclicked data, employ exposure models, or leverage propensity scores. Regrettably, these approaches often lead to biased estimations or elevated model variance, yielding sub-optimal results. To overcome these limitations, we propose a new method ReCRec that Re asons the C auses behind the implicit feedback for debiased Rec ommendation. ReCRec identifies three scenarios behind unclicked data — i.e. , unexposed, dislike or a combination of both. A reasoning module is employed to infer the category to which each instance pertains. Consequently, the model is capable of extracting reliable positive and negative signals from unclicked data, thereby facilitating more accurate learning of user preferences. We also conduct thorough theoretical analyses to demonstrate the debiased nature and low variance of ReCRec. Extensive experiments on both semi-synthetic and real-world datasets validate its superiority over state-of-the-art methods.

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)

Reference76 articles.

1. Rianne van den Berg, Thomas N Kipf, and Max Welling. 2017. Graph convolutional matrix completion. arXiv preprint arXiv:1706.02263 (2017).

2. Variational inference: A review for statisticians;Blei David M;Journal of the American statistical Association,2017

3. Stephen Bonner and Flavian Vasile. 2018. Causal embeddings for recommendation. In Proceedings of the 12th ACM conference on recommender systems. 104–112.

4. Jiawei Chen, Hande Dong, Yang Qiu, Xiangnan He, Xin Xin, Liang Chen, Guli Lin, and Keping Yang. 2021. Autodebias: Learning to debias for recommendation. In Proceedings of the 44th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. 21–30.

5. Jiawei Chen, Hande Dong, Xiang Wang, Fuli Feng, Meng Wang, and Xiangnan He. 2020. Bias and debias in recommender system: A survey and future directions. arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.03240 (2020).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3