Wearable Activity Trackers: A Survey on Utility, Privacy, and Security

Author:

Salehzadeh Niksirat Kavous1ORCID,Velykoivanenko Lev2ORCID,Zufferey Noé2ORCID,Cherubini Mauro2ORCID,Huguenin Kévin2ORCID,Humbert Mathias2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. University of Lausanne & EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland

2. University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland

Abstract

Over the past decade, wearable activity trackers (WATs) have become increasingly popular. However, despite many research studies in different fields (e.g. psychology, health, and design), few have sought to jointly examine the critical aspects of utility (i.e., benefits brought by these devices), privacy, and security (i.e., risks and vulnerabilities associated with them). To fill this gap, we reviewed 236 studies that researched the benefits of using WATs, the implications for the privacy of users of WATs, and the security vulnerabilities of these devices. Our survey revealed that these devices expose users to several threats. For example, WAT data can be mined to infer private information, such as the personality traits of the user. Whereas many works propose empirical findings about users’ privacy perceptions and their behaviors in relation to privacy, we found relatively few studies researching technologies to better protect users’ privacy with these devices. This survey contributes to systematizing knowledge on the utility, privacy, and security of WATs, shedding light on the state-of-the-art approaches with these devices, and discussing open research opportunities.

Funder

Swiss National Science Foundation

Armasuisse S+T

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)

Reference270 articles.

1. Attend and Discriminate

2. The Mediating Role of Organizational Reputation and Trust in the Intention to Use Wearable Health Devices: Cross-Country Study

3. Identifying Mobile Sensing Indicators of Stress-Resilience

4. A. Aktypi, J. R. Nurse, and M. Goldsmith. 2017. Unwinding Ariadne’s identity thread: Privacy risks with fitness trackers and online social networks. In Proceedings of the Conference on Multimedia Privacy and Security (MPS ’17). ACM, 1–11. DOI:10.1145/3137616.3137617

5. A. Almogbil, A. Alghofaili, C. Deane, T. Leschke, A. Almogbil, and A. Alghofaili. 2020. Digital forensic analysis of Fitbit wearable technology: An investigator’s guide. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Cyber Security and Cloud Computing (CSCloud ’20)International Conference on Edge Computing and Scalable Cloud (EdgeCom ’20). IEEE, 44–49. DOI:10.1109/CSCloud-EdgeCom49738.2020.00017

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3