A Survey on Evaluation of Large Language Models

Author:

Chang Yupeng1ORCID,Wang Xu1ORCID,Wang Jindong2ORCID,Wu Yuan1ORCID,Yang Linyi3ORCID,Zhu Kaijie4ORCID,Chen Hao5ORCID,Yi Xiaoyuan2ORCID,Wang Cunxiang6ORCID,Wang Yidong7ORCID,Ye Wei7ORCID,Zhang Yue6ORCID,Chang Yi1ORCID,Yu Philip S.8ORCID,Yang Qiang9ORCID,Xie Xing2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. School of Artificial Intelligence, Jilin University, Changchun, China

2. Microsoft Research Asia, Beijing, China

3. Westlake University, Hangzhou, Hangzhou, China

4. Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China

5. Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA

6. Westlake University, Hangzhou, China

7. Peking University, Beijing, China

8. University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, USA

9. Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Kowloon, China

Abstract

Large language models (LLMs) are gaining increasing popularity in both academia and industry, owing to their unprecedented performance in various applications. As LLMs continue to play a vital role in both research and daily use, their evaluation becomes increasingly critical, not only at the task level, but also at the society level for better understanding of their potential risks. Over the past years, significant efforts have been made to examine LLMs from various perspectives. This paper presents a comprehensive review of these evaluation methods for LLMs, focusing on three key dimensions: what to evaluate , where to evaluate , and how to evaluate . Firstly, we provide an overview from the perspective of evaluation tasks, encompassing general natural language processing tasks, reasoning, medical usage, ethics, education, natural and social sciences, agent applications, and other areas. Secondly, we answer the ‘where’ and ‘how’ questions by diving into the evaluation methods and benchmarks, which serve as crucial components in assessing the performance of LLMs. Then, we summarize the success and failure cases of LLMs in different tasks. Finally, we shed light on several future challenges that lie ahead in LLMs evaluation. Our aim is to offer invaluable insights to researchers in the realm of LLMs evaluation, thereby aiding the development of more proficient LLMs. Our key point is that evaluation should be treated as an essential discipline to better assist the development of LLMs. We consistently maintain the related open-source materials at: https://github.com/MLGroupJLU/LLM-eval-survey

Funder

NSF

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)

Reference267 articles.

1. Benchmarking Arabic AI with large language models;Abdelali Ahmed;arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.14982,2023

2. MEGA: Multilingual evaluation of generative AI;Ahuja Kabir;arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.12528,2023

3. Have LLMs advanced enough? A challenging problem solving benchmark for large language models;Arora Daman;arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.15074,2023

4. A general language assistant as a laboratory for alignment;Askell Amanda;arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.00861,2021

5. Benchmarking foundation models with language-model-as-an-examiner;Bai Yushi;arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.04181,2023

Cited by 182 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3