Affiliation:
1. Sirius University of Science and Technology
Abstract
<p>The article examines foreign modern theoretical and methodological approaches to the study of cognitive aspects of sports performance. A classification of approaches is presented, based on the type of tasks, the phenomenon under consideration, and the explanation of the cognitive differences between athletes and the control group. Expert performance approach, cognitive component skill approach, and ecological dynamic approach are discussed, including their theoretical foundations, key results, and employed paradigms. The expert performance approach assesses perceptual-cognitive abilities utilizing context-specific stimuli derived from photographs or videos of sporting scenarios. This approach underscores the significance of domain-specific knowledge and practical experience in achieving a high level of proficiency in sports. The cognitive component skill approach delves into the fundamental cognitive mechanisms underpinning sporting expertise by employing cognitive paradigms in laboratory settings. The ecological dynamics perspective posits that a crucial cognitive skill for athletes is the ability to perceive affordances, defined as opportunities for action determined by environmental constraints, and to effectively translate perceived affordances into motor execution. The article discusses the advantages and limitations of each approach and provides criteria to guide the development of research concepts and sports testing methods.</p>
Publisher
Moscow State University of Psychology and Education
Reference25 articles.
1. Ehmann P., Beavan A., Spielmann J., Ruf L., Mayer J., Rohrmann S., Nuà C., Englert C. 360°-multiple object tracking in team sport athletes: Reliability and relationship to visuospatial cognitive functions. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 2021. Vol. 55, article ID 101952. 8 p. DOI:10.1016/j.psychsport.2021.101952
2. Voss M.W., Kramer A.F., Basak C., Prakash R.S., Roberts B. Are expert athletes âexpertâ in the cognitive laboratory? A meta-analytic review of cognition and sport expertise. Applied Cognitive Psycholog, 2010. Vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 812â826. DOI:10.1002/acp.1588
3. Ashford M., Abraham A., Poolton J. Understanding a Playerâs Decision-Making Process in Team Sports: A Systematic Review of Empirical Evidence. Sports, 2021. Vol. 9, no. 5, article ID 65. 28 p. DOI:10.3390/sports9050065
4. Badari T., Machado G., Moniz F., Fontes A., Teoldo da Costa I. Comparison of soccer players' tactical behaviour in small-sided games according to match status. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 2021. Vol. 21, pp. 12â20. DOI:10.7752/jpes.2021.01002
5. Murakawa D., Yamagata S., Takai Y., Ikudome S., Nakamoto H. Decision making under virtual environment triggers more aggressive tactical solutions. Journal of Digital Life, 2023. Vol. 3, article ID 9. 11 p. DOI:10.51015/jdl.2023.3.9