Affiliation:
1. Training Center "Aktiv-Bezopasnost" (Active-Safety)
Abstract
<p style="text-align: justify;">Currently, it is becoming increasingly important to study progressive methods of teaching driving. This article presents a comparative analysis of traditional and progressive approaches to driving education, using the GDE (Goals for Driving Education) matrix of driving education goals as a comparative criterion. An analysis of the rationale for a progressive approach based on the theories of foreign authors was carried out. The advantages of a progressive approach to driving education open up opportunities to bring the process of driver training to a new level — the formation of not only driving skills, but also the development of self-efficacy skills — the driver's self-assessment of his/her capabilities and limitations when driving, assessing the level of risk of his/her actions, confidence in his/her abilities. Driver self-efficacy skills serve to make driving safer in a road traffic environment. The analysis of international experience indicates that driving training within the framework of only one approach cannot fully meet the need for the development of cognitive skills of various levels and fully meet all the goals of the driver training model according to the matrix-GDE. To implement all the goals set for driving training and aimed at developing a wide range of driving competencies, an integrated approach is required.</p>
Publisher
Moscow State University of Psychology and Education
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Engineering,General Environmental Science
Reference32 articles.
1. Strategiya bezopasnosti dorozhnogo dvizheniya v Rossiiskoi Federatsii na 2018—2024 g. [Road safety strategy in the Russian Federation for 2018—2024 g.] [Elektronnyi resurs]: utverzhdena rasporyazheniem Pravitel'stva Rossiiskoi Federatsii ot 08 yanvarya 2018 g. Moscow. 19 p.The Russian Government URL: http://static.government.ru/media/files/g6BXGgDI4fCEiD4xDdJUwlxudPATBC12.pdf (даÑа Accessed 09.03.2023) (In Russ.).
2. Chen C., Zhao X., Zhang Y., Rong J., Liu X. A graphical modeling method for individual driving behavior and its application in driving safety analysis using GPS data. Transportation research part F: traffic psychology and behavior, 2019. Vol. 63, pp. 118—134. DOI:10.1016/J.TRF.2019.03.017
3. Rodwell D., Hawkins A., Haworth N., Larue G.S., Bates L., Filtness A. A mixed-methods study of driver education informed by the Goals for Driver Education: Do young drivers and educators agree on what was taught? Safety Science, 2018. Vol. 108, pp. 140—148. DOI:10.1016/j.ssci.2018.04.017
4. Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1991. Vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 179—211. DOI:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
5. Zhang Z., Ma T., Ji N., Hu Z., Zhu W. An assessment of the relationship between driving skills and driving behaviors among Chinese bus drivers. Advances in Mechanical Engineering, 2020. Vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1—10. DOI:10.1177/1687814018824916