Test–retest reliability of transfer function analysis metrics for assessing dynamic cerebral autoregulation to spontaneous blood pressure oscillations

Author:

Olsen Markus Harboe1,Riberholt Christian12ORCID,Capion Tenna3,Plovsing Ronni R.45,Møller Kirsten15,Berg Ronan M. G.6789ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Neuroanaesthesiology, The Neuroscience Centre Copenhagen University Hospital – Rigshospitalet Copenhagen Denmark

2. Department of Neurorehabilitation/Traumatic Brain Injury Unit, The Neuroscience Centre Copenhagen University Hospital – Rigshospitalet Copenhagen Denmark

3. Department of Neurosurgery, The Neuroscience Centre Copenhagen University Hospital – Rigshospitalet Copenhagen Denmark

4. Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Copenhagen University Hospital – Hvidovre Copenhagen Denmark

5. Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark

6. Department of Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine, The Diagnostic Centre Copenhagen University Hospital – Rigshospitalet Copenhagen Denmark

7. Centre for Physical Activity Research Copenhagen University Hospital – Rigshospitalet Copenhagen Denmark

8. Department of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark

9. Neurovascular Research Laboratory, Faculty of Life Sciences and Education University of South Wales Pontypridd UK

Abstract

AbstractTransfer function analysis (TFA) is a widely used method for assessing dynamic cerebral autoregulation in humans. In the present study, we assessed the test–retest reliability of established TFA metrics derived from spontaneous blood pressure oscillations and based on 5 min recordings. The TFA‐based gain, phase and coherence in the low‐frequency range (0.07–0.20 Hz) from 19 healthy volunteers, 37 patients with subarachnoid haemorrhage and 19 patients with sepsis were included. Reliability assessments included the smallest real difference (SRD) and the coefficient of variance for comparing consecutive 5 min recordings, temporally separated 5 min recordings and consecutive recordings with a minimal length of 10 min. In healthy volunteers, temporally separating the 5 min recordings led to a 0.38 (0.01–0.79) cm s−1 mmHg−1 higher SRD for gain (= 0.032), and extending the duration of recordings did not affect the reliability. In subarachnoid haemorrhage, temporal separation led to a 0.85 (−0.13 to 1.93) cm s−1 mmHg−1 higher SRD (P = 0.047) and a 20 (−2 to 41)% higher coefficient of variance (= 0.038) for gain, but neither metric was affected by extending the recording duration. In sepsis, temporal separation increased the SRD for phase by 94 (23–160)° (= 0.006) but was unaffected by extending the recording. A recording duration of 8 min was required to achieve stable gain and normalized gain measures in healthy individuals, and even longer recordings were required in patients. In conclusion, a recording duration of 5 min appears insufficient for obtaining stable and reliable TFA metrics when based on spontaneous blood pressure oscillations, particularly in critically ill patients with subarachnoid haemorrhage and sepsis.

Funder

TrygFonden

Publisher

Wiley

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3