Anti-Doping Rules as a Unique System of Legal Relations: Background and Regulatory Issues

Author:

Orlov A. A.1ORCID,Gali A. A.2

Affiliation:

1. Moscow Bar Association “GRAD”

2. Lomonosov Moscow State University (MSU)

Abstract

Coordinated efforts of the States and sports organizations to eliminate doping in sport all over the world have formed a unique legal model that stands out for high uniformity in its implementation and enforcement despite differences in national regulations, and this legal model continues to evolve. Erosion of the principles of amateurism, growing governmental interest in sport, concerns about the health of athletes have affected the shape of the modern anti-doping legal system. This study analyzes the key historical stages in the development of anti-doping rules and regulations, as well as the prerequisites for the formation of its modern legal principles and methods. The study details the first anti-doping rules adopted by the Jockey Club at the beginning of the 20th century and describes the legal activities of the International Olympic Committee, States and intergovernmental organizations on creating anti-doping rules and legislation before the adoption of the UNESCO Convention in 2005. Special emphasis is placed on the explanation of ideological and political influence on the development of anti-doping rules and assessing the roles of the main actors in the antidoping system.

Publisher

Kutafin Moscow State Law University

Subject

Law

Reference20 articles.

1. Beamish, R., (2013). Olympic Ideals versus the Performance Imperative: The History of Canada’s Anti-Doping Policies. In: Thibault, L. and Harvey, J., (eds), (2013). Sport Policy in Canada. Canada; University of Ottawa Press.

2. Bird, E.J. and Wagner, G.G., (1997). Sport as a Common Property Resource: A Solution to the Dilemmas of Doping. The Journal of Confl ict Resolution, 41(6), pp. 749–766, doi: 10.1177/0022002797041006002.

3. Boje, O., (1939). A study of the means employed to raise the level of performance in sport. Bulletin of the Health Organisation of the League of Nations, 8, pp. 439–448.

4. Burke, P., (2022a). Bańka hails fi nal set of WADA governance reforms as “historical moment.” Inside the games. Available at: https://www.insidethegames.biz/articles/1123365/banka-historic-wadareforms [Accessed 23.05.2023].

5. Burke, P., (2022b). Norway fears WADA non-compliance over testing rules for young athletes. Inside the games. Available at: https://www.insidethegames.biz/articles/1127133/norway-fears-anti-doping [Accessed 23.05.2023].

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3