Breast Cancer Polygenic-Risk Score Influence on Risk-Reducing Endocrine Therapy Use: Genetic Risk Estimate (GENRE) Trial 1-Year and 2-Year Follow-Up

Author:

Stan Daniela L.12ORCID,Kim Julian O.3ORCID,Schaid Daniel J.4ORCID,Carlson Erin E.4ORCID,Kim Christina A.5ORCID,Sinnwell Jason P.4ORCID,Couch Fergus J.467ORCID,Vachon Celine M.4ORCID,Cooke Andrew L.3ORCID,Goldenberg Benjamin A.5ORCID,Pruthi Sandhya12ORCID

Affiliation:

1. 1Breast Diagnostic Clinic, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.

2. 2Mayo Clinic Cancer Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.

3. 3Department of Radiation Oncology, Max Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.

4. 4Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.

5. 5Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Max Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.

6. 6Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.

7. 7Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.

Abstract

Abstract Refinement of breast cancer risk estimates with a polygenic-risk score (PRS) may improve uptake of risk-reducing endocrine therapy (ET). A previous clinical trial assessed the influence of adding a PRS to traditional risk estimates on ET use. We stratified participants according to PRS-refined breast cancer risk and evaluated ET use and ET-related quality of life (QOL) at 1-year (previously reported) and 2-year follow-ups. Of 151 participants, 58 (38.4%) initiated ET, and 22 (14.6%) discontinued ET by 2 years; 42 (27.8%) and 36 (23.8%) participants were using ET at 1- and 2-year follow-ups, respectively. At the 2-year follow-up, 39% of participants with a lifetime breast cancer risk of 40.1% to 100.0%, 18% with a 20.1% to 40.0% risk, and 16% with a 0.0% to 20.0% risk were taking ET (overall P = 0.01). Moreover, 40% of participants whose breast cancer risk increased by 10% or greater with addition of the PRS to a traditional breast cancer-risk model were taking ET versus 0% whose risk decreased by 10% or greater (P = 0.004). QOL was similar for participants taking or not taking ET at 1- and 2-year follow-ups, although most who discontinued ET did so because of adverse effects. However, these QOL results may have been skewed by the long interval between QOL surveys and lack of baseline QOL data. PRS-informed breast cancer prevention counseling has a lasting, but waning, effect over time. Additional follow-up studies are needed to address the effect of PRS on ET adherence, ET-related QOL, supplemental breast cancer screening, and other risk-reducing behaviors. Prevention Relevance: Risk-reducing medications for breast cancer are considerably underused. Informing women at risk with precise and individualized risk assessment tools may substantially affect the incidence of breast cancer. In our study, a risk assessment tool (IBIS-polygenic-risk score) yielded promising results, with 39% of women at highest risk starting preventive medication.

Funder

The Jessiman Foundation

The Ernst Hansch Foundation Inc

Publisher

American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3