Testing a Population-Based Outreach Intervention for Ovarian Cancer Survivors to Encourage their Close Relatives to Consider Genetic Counseling

Author:

Guan Yue1ORCID,McBride Colleen M.1ORCID,Zhao Jingsong1ORCID,Pentz Rebecca D.2ORCID,Escoffery Cam1ORCID,Liu Yuan3ORCID,Cao Yichun3ORCID,An Weihua4ORCID,Shepperd James A.5ORCID,Ward Kevin C.6ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Behavioral, Social and Health Education Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia. 1

2. Department of Hematology and Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia. 2

3. Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Rollins School of Public Health & Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia. 3

4. Department of Sociology and Department of Quantitative Theory and Methods, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia. 4

5. Department of Psychology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida. 5

6. Department of Epidemiology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia. 6

Abstract

Abstract Background: Most relatives of women with ovarian cancer are unaware of their increased risk for cancer and their eligibility for genetic counseling. State cancer registries offer a platform to communicate about inherited risk to this population. Methods: We conducted a two-arm randomized trial to test a theory-based communication intervention—Your Family Connects (YFC)—compared to the standard Georgia Cancer Registry (GCR) contact. A total of 1,938 eligible ovarian cancer survivors were randomly assigned to either the YFC arm (n = 969) or the Standard Care arm (n = 969). We assessed the number of ovarian cancer survivors and their close relatives who logged on to the study website by arm. Results: Survivor reach was significantly higher in the Standard Care arm than YFC (20.8% vs. 15.2%, respectively; P < 0.001). However, reach to relatives was limited to listed relatives in the YFC arm (n = 20, 13.2%), with little participation from those in the Standard Care arm (n = 1, 0.4%). Pooling across arms, minority race, longer time since diagnosis, and older age were all significantly associated with a decreased likelihood that the survivor accessed the website. Conclusions: The YFC intervention showed lower effectiveness for engaging survivors but was more effective than Standard Care in engaging at-risk relatives. Other factors (e.g., time since diagnosis) associated with lower reach must be considered in refining future outreach approaches. Impact: Partnering with a state cancer registry to foster family communication about inherited cancer risk is feasible but the possibility for broad population reach warrants further testing.

Funder

National Cancer Institute

Publisher

American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3