Linking Physical Activity to Breast Cancer via Inflammation, Part 2: The Effect of Inflammation on Breast Cancer Risk

Author:

Lou Makayla W.C.12ORCID,Drummond Ann E.1ORCID,Swain Christopher T.V.1ORCID,Milne Roger L.123ORCID,English Dallas R.12ORCID,Brown Kristy A.4ORCID,van Roekel Eline H.5ORCID,Skinner Tina L.6ORCID,Moore Melissa M.78ORCID,Gaunt Tom R.9ORCID,Martin Richard M.910ORCID,Lewis Sarah J.9ORCID,Lynch Brigid M.1211ORCID

Affiliation:

1. 1Cancer Epidemiology Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Victoria, Australia.

2. 2Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.

3. 3Precision Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.

4. 4Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.

5. 5Department of Epidemiology, GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.

6. 6School of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, Faculty of Health and Behavioural Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.

7. 7Medical Oncology, St Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.

8. 8Department of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.

9. 9Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.

10. 10NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust and the University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.

11. 11Physical Activity Laboratory, Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, Australia.

Abstract

Abstract This review synthesized and appraised the evidence for an effect of inflammation on breast cancer risk. Systematic searches identified prospective cohort and Mendelian randomization studies relevant to this review. Meta-analysis of 13 biomarkers of inflammation were conducted to appraise the evidence for an effect breast cancer risk; we examined the dose–response of these associations. Risk of bias was evaluated using the ROBINS-E tool and the quality of evidence was appraised with Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation. Thirty-four observational studies and three Mendelian randomization studies were included. Meta-analysis suggested that women with the highest levels of C-reactive protein (CRP) had a higher risk of developing breast cancer [risk ratio (RR) = 1.13; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.01–1.26] compared with women with the lowest levels. Women with highest levels of adipokines, particularly adiponectin (RR = 0.76; 95% CI, 0.61–0.91) had a reduced breast cancer risk, although this finding was not supported by Mendelian randomization analysis. There was little evidence of an effect of cytokines, including TNFα and IL6, on breast cancer risk. The quality of evidence for each biomarker ranged from very low to moderate. Beyond CRP, the published data do not clearly support the role of inflammation in the development of breast cancer.

Funder

Wereld Kanker Onderzoek Fonds

Victorian Cancer Agency

Cancer Research UK

Publisher

American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)

Subject

Oncology,Epidemiology

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3