Perceived appropriateness of assessing for health-related socioeconomic risks among adult patients with cancer

Author:

Vu Milkie1ORCID,Boyd Kelly2ORCID,De Marchis Emilia H.3ORCID,Garnache Bridgette G.2ORCID,Gottlieb Laura M.4ORCID,Gross CaryORCID,Lee Nita K5ORCID,Lindau Stacy Tessler2ORCID,Mun Sophia6ORCID,Winslow Victoria A.2ORCID,Makelarski Jennifer A.2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, United States

2. University of Chicago Medical Center, United States

3. University of California - San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, California, United States

4. University of California - San Francisco School of Medicine, United States

5. University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL, United States

6. Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, United States

Abstract

Abstract Cancer treatment can trigger or exacerbate health-related socioeconomic risks (HRSRs) (food/housing insecurity, transportation/utilities difficulties, and interpersonal violence). The ACS and NCI recommend HRSR screening and referral, but little research has examined the perceptions of patients with cancer on the appropriateness of HRSR screening in healthcare settings. We examined whether HRSR status, desire for assistance with HRSRs, and sociodemographic and healthcare-related factors were associated with perceived appropriateness of HRSR screening in healthcare settings and comfort with HRSR documentation in electronic health records (EHR). A convenience sample of adult patients with cancer at two outpatient clinics completed self-administered surveys. We used chi-squared and Fisher’s exact tests to test for significant associations. The sample included 154 patients (72% female, 90% aged 45 years or older). Thirty-six percent reported ≥1 HRSRs and 27% desired assistance with HRSRs. Overall, 80% thought it was appropriate to assess for HRSRs in healthcare settings. The distributions of HRSR status and sociodemographic characteristics were similar among people who perceived screening to be appropriate and those who did not. Participants who perceived screening as appropriate were three times as likely to report prior experience with HRSR screening (31% versus 10%, p=0.01). Moreover, 60% felt comfortable having HRSRs documented in the EHR. Comfort with EHR documentation of HRSRs was significantly higher among patients desiring assistance with HRSRs (78%) compared to those who did not (53%; p<.01). While initiatives for HRSR screening are likely to be seen by patients with cancer as appropriate, concerns may remain over electronic documentation of HRSRs.

Publisher

American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Interventions addressing health-related social needs among patients with cancer;JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute;2024-01-04

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3