The effect of data diversity on the performance of deep learning models for predicting early gastric cancer under endoscopy

Author:

Shi Conghui,Li Jia,Wu Lianlian

Abstract

Aims To explore the effect of training set diversity on the performance of deep learning models for predicting early gastric cancer (EGC) under endoscopy. Methods Images of EGC and non-cancerous lesions under narrow-band imaging (ME-NBI) and magnifying blue laser imaging (ME-BLI) were retrospectively collected. Training set 1 was composed of 150 non-cancerous and 309 EGC ME-NBI images, training set 2 was composed of 1505 non-cancerous and 309 EGC ME-BLI images, and training set 3 was the combination of training set 1 and 2. Test set 1 was composed of 376 non-cancerous and 1052 EGC ME-NBI images, test set 2 consisted of 529 non-cancerous and 71 EGC ME-BLI images, and test set 3 was the combination of test set 1 and test set 2. Three deep learning models were constructed, which were respectively CNN 1, CNN 2, and CNN 3 (CNN 1, CNN 2 and CNN 3 were independently trained using training set 1, training set 2 and training set 3 respectively), and their performance on each test set was respectively evaluated. One hundred and thirty-eight ME-NBI videos and 17 ME-BLI videos were further collected to evaluate and compare the performance of each model in real-time. Results On the whole, the performance of CNN 3 was the best. The accuracy (Acc), sensitivity (Sn), specificity (Sp), and area under the curve (AUC) of test set 1 in CNN 3 were 87.89% (1255/1428), 90.96% (342/376), 86.79% (913/1052), and 94.60% respectively. The Acc, Sn, Sp, and AUC of test set 2 in CNN 3 were 95% (570/600), 97.92% (518/529), 73.24% (52/71), and 90.93% respectively. The Acc, Sn, Sp, and AUC of test set 3 in CNN 3 were 89.99% (1825/2028), 95.03% (860/905), 85.93% (965/1123), 94.89% respectively. The performance of CNN 3 was also the best in videos test set. The Acc, Sn, and Sp of videos test set in CNN 3 were 91.03% (142/156), 90.58% (125/138), and 94.44% (17/18) respectively. Conclusions The deep learning model with the most diverse training data has the best diagnostic effect.

Publisher

Luminescience Press Limited

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3