Efficacy of Topical Anesthetics in Pain Perception During Mini-implant Insertion: Systematic Review of Controlled Clinical Trials

Author:

Lacerda-Santos Rogério1,Bravin Thaísa Caliman1,Carvalho Fabíola Galbiatti1,Pithon Matheus Melo2,Lima Antonia Bárbara Leite3,da Silva Karina Gomes3

Affiliation:

1. Department of Orthodontics and Pediatric Dentistry, Federal University of Juiz de Fora, Governador Valadares, Minas Gerais, Brazil

2. Department of Orthodontics, State University of the Southwest of Bahia, Jéquie, Bahia, Brazil

3. Department of Orthodontics and Pediatric Dentistry, Federal University of Campina Grande, Patos, Paraíba, Brazil.

Abstract

The focus of this systematic review is to assess the efficacy of several commonly utilized anesthetic techniques for reducing pain during the placement of mini-implants. An electronic search was conducted in the databases PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Medline Complete, Cochrane, Trials Central, and Clinical Trials, without limitations on year of publication or language. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and controlled clinical trials (CCTs) were considered. Two reviewers of articles independently evaluated the results of the study, and the risk of bias of included articles was evaluated according to the Cochrane Scale. Five eligible articles (3 RCTs and 2 CCTs) were included. The quality of the body of evidence was considered low because of the presence of multiple methodological problems, high risks of bias, and heterogeneity in the articles included. There was evidence that the efficacy of the analgesia of infiltrative anesthesia was most effective in promoting a lower perception of pain compared to the other anesthetic agents, although an injection was required. Among topical anesthetics, compound topical anesthetics with 20% lidocaine were more effective than compound topical anesthetics with low lidocaine concentration and conventional topical anesthetic with 20% benzocaine.

Publisher

American Dental Society of Anesthesiology (ADSA)

Reference36 articles.

1. Comparison of topical and infiltration anesthesia for orthodontic mini-implant placement;Valieri MM,,2014

2. Uses of implants in orthodontics;Shapiro PA,,1988

3. Surgical difficulties, success, and complication rates of orthodontic miniplate anchorage systems: experience with 382 miniplates;Findik Y,,2017

4. Clinical outcome of mini-screws used as orthodontic anchorage;Justens E,,2008

5. Modified miniplates for temporary skeletal anchorage in orthodontics: placement and removal surgeries;Cornelis MA,,2008

Cited by 8 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.7亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2025 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3