An Analysis and Comparison of Widely Used Analogue Scales – VAS and Algometry

Author:

Szewczyk Jakub1,Polińska-Szewczyk Katarzyna2

Affiliation:

1. Henryk Klimontowicz Specialist Hospital in Gorlice, Poland; State School of Higher Vocational Education, Institute of Physical Education, Nowy Sącz, Poland

2. Henryk Klimontowicz Specialist Hospital in Gorlice, Poland

Abstract

Introduction: Humans have always experienced pain. Pain is defined as an unpleasant sensory and emotional experience which affects the quality of life and disturbs individuals’ day-to-day functioning. The instruments of measuring pain that are available nowadays include numeric, visual, analogue visual methods as well as the algometry-based method. Proper pain treatment plans and techniques can only be administered if accurate and correct diagnosis and measurements of pain are made. M aterial and Methods: There were 240 low back pain patients involved in the study. They were divided into two groups: 120 of them were treated on an outpatient basis, and the other 120 underwent health resort treatment. Pain measurements were made prior to and after the treatment with the use of the VAS and algometry. Results: In the study we found that the condition of the patients who received health resort treatment got much better compared to the condition of the patients who received outpatient treatment. As far the use of the measuring instruments is concerned, no differences were found between the VAS and algometry. There is no statistically significant correlation between the VAS measurements and measuring pain thresholds with the use of algometry.

Publisher

ALUNA

Reference26 articles.

1. 1. Merskey H, Bogduk N. Part III: Pain Terms, A Current List with Definitions and Notes on Usage, Classification of Chronic Pain, Second Edition, IASP Task Force on Taxonomy, IASP Press. Seattle. 1994: 209-214.

2. 2. Larysz A, Czapla K, Copik I. Ból jako piąty parametr życiowy. Magazyn Pielęgniarki i Położnej. 2013; 6:40-41.

3. 3. Woroń J, Dobrogowski J, Wordliczek J, Kleja J. Leczenie bólu w oparciu o drabinę analgetyczną WHO. Medycyna po Dyplomie. 2011; 8(185):52-61.

4. 4. Strong JS. Kliniczna ocena i pomiar bólu. [w:] Strong JU. Ból. Podręcznik dla Terapeutów. OFC Terapia Manualna. Warszawa. 2008:127-154.

5. 5. Kubasik W, Humpa F, Pawlak D. Algometria jako ocena uciskowego progu bólu. Gabinet Fizjoterapeuty. 2015;2: 34-37.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3