Barylovych, Іryna V. Кerechanyn, Larysa Ya. Fedoniuk FEATURES OF THE ACETABULUM POSTERIOR WALL FRACTURES DELAYED SURGICAL TREATMENT-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Barylovych, Іryna V. Кerechanyn, Larysa Ya. Fedoniuk FEATURES OF THE ACETABULUM POSTERIOR WALL FRACTURES DELAYED SURGICAL TREATMENT

Published:2022 Issue:9 Volume:75 Page:2209-2212
ISSN:0043-5147
Container-title:Wiadomości Lekarskie
language:en
Short-container-title:Wiad Lek

Author:

Ankin Mykola L.¹,Petryk Taras M.²,Ladyka Viktoria A.¹,Radomski Oleksander A.¹,Barylovych Mykola M.¹,Кerechanyn Іryna V.²,Fedoniuk Larysa Ya.³

Affiliation:

1. SHUPYK NATIONAL HEALTHCARE UNIVERSITY OF UKRAINE, KYIV, UKRAINE

2. PRIVET HIGHER EDUCATIONAL ESTABLISHMENT «KYIV MEDICAL UNIVERSITY», KYIV, UKRAINE

3. I.HORBACHEVSKY TERNOPIL NATIONAL MEDICAL UNIVERSITY, TERNOPIL, UKRAINE

Abstract

The aim: To analyse the results of the delayed acetabulum posterior wall fractures treatment and to identify the negative factors affecting the outcome. Materials and methods: The patients’ treatment results have been assessed in 5 years after the surgery. The surgery was performed in 21 to 120 days after the injury, 44±11 days on average. 23 individuals (19 men and 4 women) were included in the retrospective analysis. Results: Anatomical fracture reposition was achieved in 12 (52.2%) cases, imperfect but satisfactory reposition – in 7 (30.4%) cases. 4 (17.4%) cases resulted in unsatisfactory reposition. Hip arthroplasty was performed in 5 patients over the following 5 years. Conclusions: The delayed fractures of the acetabulum posterior wall (21 to 120 days after the injury) is the complicated task for a surgeon. The aseptic necrosis and deforming arthrosis were found in 1-5 years after treatment. The preparation for the anatomical reposition takes a big amount of time and effort from the orthopedic team because of technical peculiarities.

Publisher

ALUNA

Subject

General Medicine

Reference14 articles.

1. 1. Giannoudis P.V., Grotz M.R.W., Papakostidis C., Dinopoulos H. Operative treatment of displaced fractures of the acetabulum. A meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005;87(1):2-9.

2. 2. Henry P.D.G., Kreder H.J., Jenkinson R.J. The Osteoporotic Acetabular Fracture. Orthopedic Clinicsof North America. 2013;44:201–15.

3. 3. Wu E.S., Jauregui J.J., Banerjee S. et al. Outcomes of delayed total hip arthroplasty in patients with a previous ipsilateral acetabular fracture Expert Rev Med Devices. 2015;12(3):297–306. doi: 10.1586/17434440.2015.1026327.

4. 4. Das C.P., Acharya M.R., Makwana V.R. Delayed presentation of complex acetabular fractures: Review of literature on outcome of internal fixations with reference to extended ilio-femoral approach. Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma. 2020;11(6):1082-1089. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2020.10.038.

5. 5. Johnson E.E., Matta J.M., Mast J.W., Letournel E. Delayed reconstruction of acetabular fractures 21 to 120 days following injury. ClinOrthop. 1994; 305:20–30.