Kriterien der Nutzenbewertung der Integrativen Medizin am Beispiel der Anthroposophischen Medizin
Author:
Publisher
Gesellschaft Anthroposophischer Arzte in Deutschland (GAAD)
Subject
General Medicine
Reference99 articles.
1. Gyawali B, de Vries EGE, Dafni U, et al. Biases in study design, implementation, and data analysis that distort the appraisal of clinical benefit and ESMO-Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale (ESMO-MCBS) scoring. ESMO Open 2021;6(3):100117. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esmoop.2021.100117.
2. Ribi K, Kalbermatten N, Eicher M, et al. Towards a novel approach guiding the decision-making process for anticancer treatment in patients with advanced cancer: framework for systemic anticancer treatment with palliative intent. ESMO Open 2022;7(3):100496. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esmoop.2022.100496.
3. Panic N, Leoncini E, de Belvis G, et al. Evaluation of the endorsement of the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis (PRISMA) statement on the quality of published systematic review and meta-analyses. PLoS One 2013;8(12):e83138. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0083138.
4. Atkins D, Best D, Briss PA, et al. Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ 2004;328(7454):1490. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.328.7454.1490.
5. Gagnier JJ, Riley D, Altman DG, et al. The CARE guidelines: consensus-based clinical case reporting guideline development. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2013;110(37):603–608. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3238/arztebl.2013.0603.
1.学者识别学者识别
2.学术分析学术分析
3.人才评估人才评估
"全球学者库"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前全球学者库共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370
www.globalauthorid.com
TOP
Copyright © 2019-2023 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司 京公网安备11010802033243号 京ICP备18003416号-3