Can Deep Learning Improve Genomic Prediction of Complex Human Traits?

Author:

Bellot Pau11,de los Campos Gustavo23,Pérez-Enciso Miguel14

Affiliation:

1. Centre for Research in Agricultural Genomics (CRAG), Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC) - Institut de Recerca i Tecnologies Agroalimentaries (IRTA) - Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB) - Universitat de Barcelona (UB) Consortium, 08193 Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain

2. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824

3. Department of Statistics, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824

4. Institut Català de Recerca Avançada (ICREA), 08010 Barcelona, Spain

Abstract

Abstract The current excitement around artificial intelligence and the renewed interest in “deep learning” (DL) have been applied to the genetic analysis of complex traits; however, the performance of DL for genomic prediction of complex... The genetic analysis of complex traits does not escape the current excitement around artificial intelligence, including a renewed interest in “deep learning” (DL) techniques such as Multilayer Perceptrons (MLPs) and Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs). However, the performance of DL for genomic prediction of complex human traits has not been comprehensively tested. To provide an evaluation of MLPs and CNNs, we used data from distantly related white Caucasian individuals (n ∼100k individuals, m ∼500k SNPs, and k = 1000) of the interim release of the UK Biobank. We analyzed a total of five phenotypes: height, bone heel mineral density, body mass index, systolic blood pressure, and waist–hip ratio, with genomic heritabilities ranging from ∼0.20 to 0.70. After hyperparameter optimization using a genetic algorithm, we considered several configurations, from shallow to deep learners, and compared the predictive performance of MLPs and CNNs with that of Bayesian linear regressions across sets of SNPs (from 10k to 50k) that were preselected using single-marker regression analyses. For height, a highly heritable phenotype, all methods performed similarly, although CNNs were slightly but consistently worse. For the rest of the phenotypes, the performance of some CNNs was comparable or slightly better than linear methods. Performance of MLPs was highly dependent on SNP set and phenotype. In all, over the range of traits evaluated in this study, CNN performance was competitive to linear models, but we did not find any case where DL outperformed the linear model by a sizable margin. We suggest that more research is needed to adapt CNN methodology, originally motivated by image analysis, to genetic-based problems in order for CNNs to be competitive with linear models.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Genetics

Reference44 articles.

1. Predicting the sequence specificities of DNA- and RNA-binding proteins by deep learning.;Alipanahi;Nat. Biotechnol.,2015

2. Second-generation PLINK: rising to the challenge of larger and richer datasets.;Chang;Gigascience,2015

3. Chollet F , 2015 Keras: deep learning library for theano and tensorflow. Available at: https://keras.io/. Accessed May 1, 2018.

4. de Los Campos, G., and A. Grueneberg, 2017 BGData: a suite of packages for analysis of big genomic data. R package version 1.0.0.9000. Available at:https://github.com/QuantGen/BGData

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3