Return to work for adults following stroke: a scoping review of interventions, factors, barriers, and facilitators

Abstract

Objective: This scoping review aimed to map the literature on interventions, factors, barriers, and facilitators for return to work for adults post-stroke with or without communication disorders. Introduction: Difficulties in returning to work can significantly impact individuals following a stroke (eg, their sense of purpose and self-esteem), not only financially, but also as they adjust to the change in their situation. Such difficulties may arise from communication disorders as well as physical impairments. Previous reviews on return to work post-stroke have focused on specific aspects, such as interventions, or barriers and facilitators, but have not provided a comprehensive map of the field. Further, no systematic or scoping reviews to date have focused on literature addressing return to work for people with communication disorders post-stroke. Inclusion criteria: This review considered literature that reported on interventions, barriers, and facilitators for return to work for adults (aged 16 years or older) following an ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke. Records focusing on transient ischemic attacks or acquired brain injury were excluded, as were those in which a comorbidity or disability (eg, learning disability, dementia, respiratory disorder) had a significant impact on the individual’s ability to work. Methods: This review followed the JBI scoping review methodology. Primary research of any type, systematic and non-systematic reviews, and gray literature from developed countries written in English from 2010 to the present day were identified from 7 databases, 2 gray literature repositories, JBI Evidence Synthesis, and an internet search. Records were screened for relevance to the review topic by 2 independent reviewers, and data relevant to the review questions were extracted. Findings were presented as narrative supported by tables. Results: Of the 106 sources included, 61 addressed demographic-based, socioeconomic-based, impairment-based, or recovery-based factors related to return to work. One of these 61 sources, a narrative review, focused on communication disorders. Thirty-eight sources explored barriers and facilitators for return to work from different stakeholders’ perspectives; 3 of these 38 sources, including 2 qualitative studies and 1 narrative review, focused on post-stroke communication disorders. Eleven sources focused on interventions, including 7 studies (reported across 9 sources) that developed or tested return-to-work interventions. Of these primary studies, 1 randomized controlled trial and 1 retrospective cohort study were identified. The remaining intervention studies were case studies or case series. None of these intervention studies addressed communication disorders. Conclusions: While there has been extensive research on factors, barriers, and facilitators for return to work post-stroke, there is a lack of research on interventions supporting return to work. There is also a significant gap in the evidence base on returning to work with a post-stroke communication disorder, highlighting the need for further research in this important area.