Comparison of Carvedilol to Propranolol in Reduction of Hepatic Venous Pressure Gradient in Liver Cirrhosis: A Meta‐Analysis

Author:

Joshi Amey1ORCID,Raja Hafsa Arshad Azam2,Roy Poulami3,Latif Fakhar4,Reji Rahul George5,Deb Novonil3,Mui Ryan K.6,Shady Ahmed6

Affiliation:

1. Department of Internal Medicine Sparrow Hospital—Michigan State University East Lansing Michigan USA

2. Rawalpindi Medical University Rawalpindi Pakistan

3. North Bengal Medical College and Hospital Siliguri West Bengal India

4. Dow University of Health Sciences Karachi Sindh Pakistan

5. Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research Puducherry India

6. Department of Gastroenterology Sparrow Hospital—University of Michigan East Lansing Michigan USA

Abstract

ABSTRACTBackgroundNonselective beta‐blockers, such as propranolol and carvedilol, are used to prevent first decompensation in patients with clinically significant portal hypertension.MethodsWe performed a systematic literature search of English language articles from inception in PubMed, Medline, and Cochrane databases to compare the effect of carvedilol and propranolol on systemic and splanchnic hemodynamics. Mean differences were pooled using a random‐effect model, and a p‐value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.ResultsSeven RCTs with a total of 351 patients were involved in the final analysis. Reduction in hepatic venous pressure gradient was significantly greater in the carvedilol group (MD = −0.76, 95% CI = −1.45 to −0.08; p = 0.03). Decrease in systemic vascular resistance and mean arterial pressure was significantly greater in the carvedilol group ([MD = −190.55, 95% CI = −307.5 to −73.58; p = 0.001] and [MD = −3.65, 95% CI = −5.94 to −1.36; p = 0.002], respectively). Decrease in cardiac output was greater in the propranolol group (MD = 0.92, 95% CI = 0.45–1.38; p = 0.004). Decrease in hepatic blood flow and right atrial pressure appeared to be greater in the propranolol group; however, this did not reach statistical significance ([MD = 0.13, 95% CI = −0.06 to 0.32; p = 0.17] and [MD = 0.28, 95% CI = −0.27 to 0.83; p = 0.32], respectively). Decrease in mean pulmonary arterial pressure appeared to be greater in the carvedilol group; however, this was not statistically significant (MD = −0.75, 95% CI = −1.60 to 0.10; p = 0.08). There was no difference in incidence of rebleeding, shortness of breath, hepatic encephalopathy, and hypotension between the two groups.ConclusionCarvedilol demonstrated a significantly greater reduction in HVPG, SVR, and MAP compared to propranolol, with no significant difference in adverse effects.

Funder

Michigan State University Research Foundation

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.7亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2025 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3