Differences between Registered Nurses and nurse assistants around missed nursing care—An observational, comparative study

Author:

Nymark Carolin12,Falk Ann‐Charlotte3,von Vogelsang Ann‐Christin14,Göransson Katarina E.56

Affiliation:

1. Heart, Vascular and Neuro Theme Karolinska University Hospital Stockholm Sweden

2. Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society Karolinska Institutet Stockholm Sweden

3. Department for Health Promoting Science Sophiahemmet University Stockholm Sweden

4. Department of Clinical Neuroscience Karolinska Institutet Stockholm Sweden

5. School of Health and Welfare Dalarna University Falun Sweden

6. Department of Medicine Karolinska Institutet Stockholm Sweden

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundFrom a nursing perspective, tasks that are not carried out, and the consequences of this, have been studied for over a decade. The difference between Registered Nurses (RNs) and nurse assistants (NAs) regarding qualifications and work tasks, and the profound knowledge around RN‐to‐patient ratios, warrants investigating missed nursing care (MNC) for each group rather than as one (nursing staff).AimTo describe and compare RNs and NAs ratings of and reasons for MNC at in‐hospital wards.MethodsA cross‐sectional study with a comparative approach. RNs and NAs at in‐hospital medical and surgical wards for adults were invited to answer the MISSCARE Survey‐Swedish version, including questions on patient safety and quality of care.ResultsA total of 205 RNs and 219 NAs answered the questionnaire. Quality of care and patient safety was rated as good by both RNs and NAs. Compared to NAs, RNs reported more MNC, for example, in the item ‘Turning patient every 2 h’ (p < 0.001), ‘Ambulation three times per day or as ordered’ (p = 0.018), and ‘Mouth care’ (p < 0.001). NAs reported more MNC in the items ‘Medications administered within 30 min before or after scheduled time’ (p = 0.005), and ‘Patient medication requests acted on within 15 min’ (p < 0.001). No significant differences were found between the samples concerning reasons for MNC.ConclusionThis study demonstrated that RNs' and NAs' ratings of MNC to a large extent differed between the groups. RNs and NAs should be viewed as separate groups based on their different knowledge levels and roles when caring for patients. Thus, viewing all nursing staff as a homogenous group in MNC research may mask important differences between the groups. These differences are important to address when taking actions to reduce MNC in the clinical setting.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3