Perspectives of women living with type 1 diabetes regarding preconception and antenatal care: A qualitative evidence synthesis

Author:

Toledo‐Chavarri Ana1234,Delgado Janet25ORCID,Rodríguez‐Martín Beatriz46

Affiliation:

1. Canary Islands Health Research Institute Foundation, (FIISC) Tenerife Spain

2. The Spanish Network of Agencies for Health Technology Assessment and Services of the National Health System (RedETS) Madrid Spain

3. Research Network on Health Services in Chronic Diseases (REDISSEC) Spain

4. Network for Research on Chronicity, Primary Care, and Health Promotion (RICAPPS) Spain

5. Department of Philosophy I University of Granada, Campus Universitario de Cartuja CP Granada Spain

6. Department of Nursing, Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Castilla‐La Mancha Talavera de la Reina (Toledo) Spain

Abstract

AbstractIntroductionPregnant women with type 1 diabetes may have an increased risk of complications for both the baby and themselves. Educational programmes, preconception planning, strict glycemic control and comprehensive medical care are some of the antenatal interventions that have been proposed to improve the outcomes of pregnant women with type 1 diabetes. While some evidence‐based recommendations about antenatal care are included in clinical practice guidelines (CPGs), the views, and experiences of women with type 1 diabetes about these interventions are not well known.AimTo understand and synthesize the perceptions of women with type 1 diabetes about the interventions before pregnancy.MethodA qualitative evidence synthesis (QES) was carried out with a framework analysis guided by the Cochrane Qualitative and Implementation Methods Group approach. Three online databases (Medline, Embase and Web of Science) were searched. We included qualitative articles that were published from 2011 to 2021 and which were available in English or Spanish.FindingsTen references met the inclusion criteria of the study and were included. Three main themes were identified: (a) acceptability of antenatal care, (b) feasibility and implementation consideration and (c) equity and accessibility difficulties.ConclusionContinuity of care, coordination between health professionals and services, and a more holistic approach are the key aspects women say need to be considered for more acceptable, feasible and equitable preconception and antenatal care.Patient or Public ContributionThis QES was carried out as part of the CPGs on diabetes mellitus type 1, carried out as part of the Spanish Network of Health Technology Assessment Agencies. In this CPG, the representatives of the patient associations are Francisco Javier Darias Yanes, from the Association for Diabetes of Tenerife, who has participated in all the phases of the CPG; Aureliano Ruiz Salmón and Julián Antonio González Hernández (representatives of the Spanish Diabetes Federation (FEDE) who have participated as collaborator and external reviewer, respectively.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3