Systematic review with meta‐analysis: Medical therapies for treatment of ulcerative proctitis

Author:

Aruljothy Achuthan1,Singh Siddharth2ORCID,Narula Neeraj3ORCID,Moran Gordon W.4ORCID,Vuyyuru Sudheer K.15,Hogan Malcolm5,Zayadi Alexa5,MacDonald John K.5,Caron Benedicte67,Danese Silvio8ORCID,Peyrin Biroulet Laurent67ORCID,Ma Christopher5910ORCID,Jairath Vipul151112ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology Western University London Ontario Canada

2. Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine University of California San Diego La Jolla California USA

3. Division of Gastroenterology McMaster University Hamilton Ontario Canada

4. National Institute of Health Research Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre University of Nottingham and Nottingham University Hospitals Nottingham UK

5. Alimentiv, Inc. London Ontario Canada

6. Department of Gastroenterology University of Lorraine, CHRU‐Nancy Nancy France

7. University of Lorraine, Inserm, NGERE Nancy France

8. Gastroenterology and Endoscopy IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele and University Vita‐Salute San Raffaele Milan Italy

9. Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology University of Calgary Calgary Alberta Canada

10. Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine University of Calgary Calgary Alberta Canada

11. Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry Western University London Ontario Canada

12. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics University of Western Ontario London Ontario Canada

Abstract

SummaryBackgroundUlcerative proctitis (UP) is a common highly symptomatic form of ulcerative colitis that can be difficult to treat.AimTo assess the efficacy of medical treatments for UP.MethodsWe searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL on 23 November 2022 for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of medical therapy for adults with UP. Primary outcomes included induction and maintenance of clinical remission. Pooled risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for each outcome.ResultsWe included 53 RCTs (n = 4096) including 46 induction studies (n = 3731) and seven maintenance studies (n = 365). First‐line therapies included topical 5‐aminosalicylic acid (5‐ASA), conventional corticosteroids, budesonide, and oral 5‐ASA. Therapy for refractory UP included topical tacrolimus and small molecules. Topical 5‐ASA was superior to placebo for induction (RR 2.72, 95% CI 1.94–3.82) and maintenance of remission (RR 2.09, 95% CI 1.26–3.46). Topical corticosteroids were superior to placebo for induction of remission (RR 2.83, 95% CI 1.62–4.92). Topical budesonide was superior to placebo for induction of remission (RR 2.34, 95% CI 1.44–3.81). Combination therapy with topical 5‐ASA and topical corticosteroids was superior to topical monotherapy with either agent. Topical tacrolimus was superior to placebo. Etrasimod was superior to placebo for induction (RR 4.71, 95% CI 1.2–18.49) and maintenance of remission (RR 2.08, 95% CI 1.31–3.32).ConclusionsTopical 5‐ASA and corticosteroids are effective for active UP. Topical 5‐ASA may be effective for maintenance of remission. Tacrolimus may be effective for induction of remission. Etrasimod may be effective for induction and for maintenance of remission. Trials should include UP to expand the evidence base for this under‐represented population.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Pharmacology (medical),Gastroenterology,Hepatology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3