Affiliation:
1. Faculty of Medicine Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ) Rio de Janeiro Rio de Janeiro Brazil
2. Faculty of Medicine Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa (UEPG) Ponta Grossa Paraná Brazil
3. Faculty of Medicine Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF) Niterói Rio de Janeiro Brazil
4. Division of Neurological Surgery, Hospital das Clínicas Universidade de São Paulo (USP) São Paulo Brazil
5. Neurology Department, Hospital das Clínicas Universidade de São Paulo (USP) São Paulo Brazil
6. Division of Neurological Surgery, Hospital Antônio Pedro Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF) Niterói Rio de Janeiro Brazil
Abstract
AbstractDeep brain stimulation (DBS) of the anterior nucleus of the thalamus (ANT) is a widespread invasive procedure for treating drug‐resistant epilepsy. Nonetheless, there is a persistent debate regarding the short‐term and long‐term efficacy and safety of ANT‐DBS. Thus we conducted a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses (PRISMA), we searched PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, and Web of Science for studies treating refractory epilepsy with ANT‐DBS. Short‐term analysis was considered for studies with a mean follow‐up of 3 years or less. The following outcomes were assessed for data extraction: procedure responders and nonresponders, increased seizure frequency, complications, and procedure‐related mortality. Of 650 studies, 25 fit our inclusion criteria, involving 427 patients. Previous surgical treatments have been reported in 214 patients (50.1%) and a median average baseline seizure frequency of 64.9 monthly seizures. In the short‐term analysis, we observed a proportion of 67% (95% confidence interval [CI] 54%–79%) of responders and 33% (95% CI 21%–46%) of nonresponders. In addition, 4% (95% CI 0%–9%) of the patients presented increased seizure frequency. In the long‐term analysis, we observed 72% (95% CI 66%–78%) responders and 27% (95% CI 21%–34%) nonresponders. Moreover, there was a 2% (95% CI 0%–5%) increase in seizure frequency. No procedure‐related mortality was reported at any follow‐up. ANT‐DBS effectively treats refractory epilepsy, with lasting short‐term and long‐term benefits. It remains safe and efficient despite complications, showing no procedure‐linked fatalities, high patient responsiveness, and minimal increased seizures. Consistent results over time and low morbidity/mortality rates emphasize its worth. Further research is necessary to diminish the discrepancy among results.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Deep brain stimulation;Reference Module in Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Psychology;2024