Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy of Serum Refractometry and Brix Refractometry for the Diagnosis of Inadequate Transfer of Passive Immunity in Calves

Author:

Buczinski S.1ORCID,Gicquel E.1,Fecteau G.1,Takwoingi Y.2,Chigerwe M.3,Vandeweerd J.M.4

Affiliation:

1. Department of clinical sciences Faculté de Médecine Vétérinaire Université de Montréal Saint‐Hyacinthe QC Canada

2. Institute of Applied Health Research University of Birmingham Birmingham UK

3. Department of Medicine and Epidemiology University of California‐Davis Davis CA

4. Integrated Veterinary Research Unit Department of Veterinary Medicine Faculty of Sciences Research Institute for Life Sciences Université de Namur Namur Belgium

Abstract

BackgroundTransfer of passive immunity in calves can be assessed by direct measurement of immunoglobulin G (IgG) by methods such as radial immunodiffusion (RID) or turbidimetric immunoassay (TIA). IgG can also be measured indirectly by methods such as serum refractometry (REF) or Brix refractometry (BRIX).ObjectivesTo determine the accuracy ofREFandBRIXfor assessment of inadequate transfer of passive immunity (ITPI) in calves.DesignSystematic review and meta‐analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies.MethodsDatabases (PubMed andCABAbstract, Searchable Proceedings of Animal Science) and Google Scholar were searched for relevant studies. Studies were eligible if the accuracy (sensitivity and specificity) ofREForBRIXwas determined using direct measurement of IgG byRIDor turbidimetry as the reference standard. The study population included calves <14 days old that were fed with natural colostrum (colostrum replacement products were excluded). Quality assessment was performed by theQUADAS‐2 tool. Hierarchical models were used for meta‐analysis.ResultsFrom 1,291 references identified, 13 studies of 3,788 calves were included. Of these, 11 studies evaluatedREFand 5 studies evaluatedBRIX. The median (range) prevalence ofITPI(defined as calves with IgG <10 g/L byRIDorTIA) was 21% (1.3–56%). Risk of bias and applicability concerns were generally low or unclear. ForREF, summary estimates were obtained for 2 different cutoffs: 5.2 g/dL(6 studies) and 5.5 g/dL(5 studies). For the 5.2 g/dLcutoff, the summary sensitivity (95%CI) and specificity (95%CI) were 76.1% (63.8–85.2%) and 89.3% (82.3–93.7%), and 88.2% (80.2–93.3%) and 77.9% (74.5–81.0%) for the 5.5 g/dLcutoff. Due to the low number of studies using the same cutoffs, summary estimates could not be obtained for BRIX.Conclusions and Clinical ImportanceDespite their widespread use on dairy farms, evidence about the optimal strategy for using refractometry, including the optimal cutoff, are sparse (especially forBRIX). When usingREFto rule outITPIin herds, the 5.5 g/dLcutoff may be used whereas for ruling inITPI, the 5.2 g/dLcutoff may be used.

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.7亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2025 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3