The abundant fraction of soil microbiomes regulates the rhizosphere function in crop wild progenitors-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

The abundant fraction of soil microbiomes regulates the rhizosphere function in crop wild progenitors

Published:2024-06 Issue:6 Volume:27 Page:
ISSN:1461-023X
Container-title:Ecology Letters
language:en
Short-container-title:Ecology Letters

Author:

de Celis Miguel¹^ORCID,Fernández‐Alonso María José²³,Belda Ignacio⁴,García Carlos⁵,Ochoa‐Hueso Raúl⁶^ORCID,Palomino Javier²,Singh Brajesh K.⁷⁸,Yin Yue⁹,Wang Jun‐Tao⁷⁸,Abdala‐Roberts Luis¹⁰,Alfaro Fernando D.¹¹,Angulo‐Pérez Diego¹²,Arthikala Manoj‐Kumar¹³,Corwin Jason¹⁴,Gui‐Lan Duan¹⁵^ORCID,Hernandez‐Lopez Antonio¹⁶,Nanjareddy Kalpana¹³,Pasari Babak¹⁷,Quijano‐Medina Teresa¹⁰,Rivera Daniela S.¹¹,Shaaf Salar¹⁸,Trivedi Pankaj¹⁴,Yang Qingwen¹⁹,Zaady Eli²⁰,Zhu Yong‐Guan²¹,Delgado‐Baquerizo Manuel²²^ORCID,Milla Rubén²²³,García‐Palacios Pablo¹²⁴

Affiliation:

1. Departamento de Suelo, Planta y Calidad Ambiental Instituto de Ciencias Agrarias, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas Madrid Spain

2. Area of Biodiversity and Conservation, Department of Biology and Geology, Physics and Inorganic Chemistry Universidad Rey Juan Carlos Móstoles Spain

3. Departamento de Geología y Geoquímica Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid Madrid Spain

4. Department of Genetics, Physiology and Microbiology, Microbiology Unit, Faculty of Biology Complutense University of Madrid Madrid Spain

5. Department of Soil and Water Conservation and Organic Waste Management CEBAS‐CSIC Murcia Spain

6. Department of Biology, IVAGRO University of Cádiz Cádiz Spain

7. Hawkesbury Institute for the Environment Western Sydney University Penrith New South Wales Australia

8. Global Centre for Land‐Based Innovation Western Sydney University Penrith New South Wales Australia

9. State Key Laboratory of Urban and Regional Ecology, Research Center for Eco‐Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing China

10. Departamento de Ecología Tropical Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán Mérida Yucatán Mexico

11. GEMA Center for Genomics, Ecology and Environment Universidad Mayor Santiago Chile

12. Unidad de Recursos Naturales, Centro de Investigación Científica de Yucatán, A.C. Mérida Yucatán Mexico

13. Ciencias Agrogenómicas, Escuela Nacional de Estudios Superiores Unidad León‐Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM) León Guanajuato Mexico

14. Microbiome Network and Department of Agricultural Biology Colorado State University Fort Collins Colorado USA

15. State Key Lab of Urban and Regional Ecology, Research Center for Eco‐Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing China

16. Escuela Nacional de Estudios Superiores Unidad León Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México Guanajuato Mexico

17. Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, Sanandaj Branch Islamic Azad University Sanandaj Iran

18. Leibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research (IPK) Seeland Germany

19. National Key Facility for Crop Gene Resources and Genetic Improvement Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences Beijing China

20. Department of Natural Resources, Agricultural Research Organization Gilat Research Center, Institute of Plant Sciences Mobile Post Negev Israel

21. Key Laboratory of Urban Environment and Health Institute of Urban Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences Xiamen China

22. Laboratorio de Biodiversidad y Funcionamiento Ecosistémico Instituto de Recursos Naturales y Agrobiología de Sevilla (IRNAS), CSIC Sevilla Spain

23. Global Change Research Institute Universidad Rey Juan Carlos Móstoles Spain

24. Department of Plant and Microbial Biology University of Zurich Zurich Switzerland

Abstract

AbstractThe rhizosphere influence on the soil microbiome and function of crop wild progenitors (CWPs) remains virtually unknown, despite its relevance to develop microbiome‐oriented tools in sustainable agriculture. Here, we quantified the rhizosphere influence—a comparison between rhizosphere and bulk soil samples—on bacterial, fungal, protists and invertebrate communities and on soil multifunctionality across nine CWPs at their sites of origin. Overall, rhizosphere influence was higher for abundant taxa across the four microbial groups and had a positive influence on rhizosphere soil organic C and nutrient contents compared to bulk soils. The rhizosphere influence on abundant soil microbiomes was more important for soil multifunctionality than rare taxa and environmental conditions. Our results are a starting point towards the use of CWPs for rhizosphere engineering in modern crops.

Funder

Ministerio de Universidades

Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación

Fundación BBVA

Publisher

Wiley

Link

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/ele.14462

Reference94 articles.

1. The hidden seasonality of the rare biosphere in coastal marine bacterioplankton

2. Plant Microbiome Engineering: Expected Benefits for Improved Crop Growth and Resilience

3. Why are some microbes more ubiquitous than others? Predicting the habitat breadth of soil bacteria

4. Interactions Between Mycorrhizal Fungi and Bacteria to Improve Plant Nutrient Cycling and Soil Structure

5. High‐throughput fluorometric measurement of potential soil extracellular enzyme activities;Bell C.W.;Journal of Visualized Experiments,2013