Homoeologous crossovers are distally biased and underlie genomic instability in first‐generation neo‐allopolyploid Arabidopsis suecica

Author:

Nibau Candida1ORCID,Evans Aled1,King Holly1,Phillips Dylan Wyn2ORCID,Lloyd Andrew1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Institute of Biological, Environmental & Rural Sciences (IBERS) Aberystwyth University Gogerddan Aberystwyth Ceredigion SY23 3EE UK

2. Department of Life Sciences Aberystwyth University Penglais Aberystwyth Ceredigion SY23 3DA UK

Abstract

Summary First‐generation polyploids often suffer from more meiotic errors and lower fertility than established wild polyploid populations. One such example is the allopolyploid model species Arabidopsis suecica which originated c. 16 000 generations ago. We present here a comparison of meiosis and its outcomes in naturally evolved and first‐generation ‘synthetic’ A. suecica using a combination of cytological and genomic approaches. We show that while meiosis in natural lines is largely diploid‐like, synthetic lines have high levels of meiotic errors including incomplete synapsis and nonhomologous crossover formation. Whole‐genome re‐sequencing of progeny revealed 20‐fold higher levels of homoeologous exchange and eightfold higher aneuploidy originating from synthetic parents. Homoeologous exchanges showed a strong distal bias and occurred predominantly in genes, regularly generating novel protein variants. We also observed that homoeologous exchanges can generate megabase scale INDELs when occurring in regions of inverted synteny. Finally, we observed evidence of sex‐specific differences in adaptation to polyploidy with higher success in reciprocal crosses to natural lines when synthetic plants were used as the female parent. Our results directly link cytological phenotypes in A. suecica with their genomic outcomes, demonstrating that homoeologous crossovers underlie genomic instability in neo‐allopolyploids and are more distally biased than homologous crossovers.

Funder

UK Research and Innovation

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3