Validation of the Parental Understanding and Misperceptions about BAby's Sleep Questionnaire using auto‐videosomnography

Author:

Jang Eunyeong1ORCID,Kang Solbi1,Bei Bei2ORCID,Chung Seockhoon3,Gradisar Michael45,Kahn Michal6ORCID,Barnett Natalie7,Suh Sooyeon1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Psychology Sungshin Women's University Seoul Korea

2. Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, School of Psychological Sciences, The Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health Monash University Clayton Vic. Australia

3. Department of Psychiatry, Asan Medical Center University of Ulsan College of Medicine Seoul South Korea

4. WINK Sleep Pty Ltd Adelaide SA Australia

5. Sleep Cycle AB Gothenburg Sweden

6. College of Education, Psychology and Social Work Flinders University Adelaide SA Australia

7. Research Department Nanit New York NY USA

Abstract

BackgroundPrevious studies have suggested that parental cognitions about child's sleep may be an important factor underlying pediatric sleep problems. The current study aimed to (a) develop an assessment tool measuring parental understanding and misperceptions about baby's sleep (PUMBA‐Q); (b) validate the questionnaire using self‐report and objective sleep measures.MethodsThere were 1,420 English‐speaking caregivers (68.0% mothers, 46.8% of children being females, mean age 12.3 months), who has completed online self‐reported questionnaires. The PUMBA‐Q, which was developed for this study, Dysfunctional Beliefs and Attitudes about Sleep (DBAS) and Maternal Cognitions about Infant Sleep Questionnaire (MCISQ) were included to evaluate participant's thoughts on their own or child's sleep. Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) was collected to access participant's subjective insomnia severity. Brief Infant Sleep Questionnaire‐Revised (BISQ‐R) was used to assess parental‐reported child sleep. Auto‐videosomnography was used to record child's sleep.ResultsExploratory factor analysis indicated the best fit with a 4‐factor model using 23 items (RMSEA = .039). The four subscales were labeled: (a) Misperceptions about parental intervention; (b) Misperceptions about feeding; (c) Misperceptions about child's sleep; and (d) General anxiety of parents. Internal consistency was adequate (Cronbach's alpha = .86). PUMBA‐Q scores were significantly associated with MCISQ (r = .64, p < .01), DBAS (r = .36, p < .01), ISI (r = .29, p < .01), BISQ‐R (r = .‐49, p < .01), objective child's total sleep time (r = −.24, p < .01) and objective number of parental nighttime visits (r = .26, p < .01).ConclusionsThe results demonstrated that PUMBA‐Q 23 is a valid assessment tool for parental cognitions of child sleep. The link between parental cognitions and child sleep highlights the importance of managing parental cognitions about child sleep when treating pediatric sleep problems.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health,Developmental and Educational Psychology,Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3