Rebound pain and postoperative pain profile following brachial plexus block compared to general anaesthesia—An observational study

Author:

Schubert Ann‐Kristin1ORCID,Wiesmann Thomas12,Volberg Christian1,Riecke Jenny3,Schneider Alexander1,Wulf Hinnerk1,Dinges Hanns‐Christian1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine University Hospital Marburg, Philipps University of Marburg Marburg Germany

2. Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine Diakoneo Diak Klinikum Schwäbisch‐Hall Schwäbisch‐Hall Germany

3. Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy Philipps University Marburg Marburg Germany

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundRegional anaesthesia has the benefit of reducing the need for systemic analgesia and therefore, potentially reducing undesired side effects. With the end of the sensory nerve block however, many patients report severe pain that requires therapy with opioids and often compromise the initial opioid sparing effect. This study aimed to characterise the postoperative pain profile and the phenomenon of rebound pain after axillary brachial plexus anaesthesia (RA) compared to general anaesthesia (GA).DesignSingle‐centre observational, stratified cohort study.SettingThe study was conducted at University Hospital Marburg from May 2020 until September 2022.ParticipantsOne hundred thirty‐two patients receiving elective hand and forearm surgery were enrolled in this study.InterventionsGroup RA received ultrasound‐guided brachial plexus anaesthesia via the axillary approach with 30 mL of prilocaine 1% and 10 mL ropivacaine 0.2%. Group GA received balanced or total intravenous general anaesthesia.Main Outcome MeasuresPrimary endpoint were integrated pain scores (IPS) within 24 h postoperatively. Secondary endpoints were pain scores (NRS 0–10), morphine equivalents, patient satisfaction, quality of recovery and opioid‐related side effects.ResultsOne hundred thirty‐two patients were analysed of which 66 patients received brachial plexus block and 66 patients received general anaesthesia. Following RA significantly lower IPS were seen directly after surgery (p < .001) and during the post‐anaesthesia care unit interval (p < .001) but equalised after 3 h at the ward. No overshoot in pain scores or increased opioid consumption could be detected. Patient satisfaction and postoperative recovery were comparable between both groups.ConclusionThe IPS and NRS was initially lower in the RA group, increased with fading of the block until equal to the GA group and equal thereafter. Although various definitions of rebound pain were met during this phase, the opioid sparing effect of regional anaesthesia was not counteracted by it. The incidence of episodes with uncontrolled, severe pain did not differ between groups. We found no clinical implications of rebound pain in this setting, since the RA group did not show higher pain scores than the GA group at any time point.Trial Registration: German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00021764).

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine,General Medicine

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3