Development of the coreHEM mental health patient‐reported outcome measure – A novel mental health outlook measure for people with haemophilia

Author:

Clearfield Elizabeth12ORCID,Chang Hsing‐Yuan13,Janssen Ellen M.1,Majid Tabassum4,Messner Donna A.1,Coffin Donna5ORCID,Jain Mohit6,Monahan Paul E.7,Valentino Leonard A.89ORCID,Witkop Michelle8,Skinner Mark W.210ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Center for Medical Technology Policy Baltimore USA

2. Institute for Policy Advancement Ltd Washington USA

3. Department of Pediatrics Chang Gung Memorial Hospital Taoyuan Taiwan

4. Erickson School of Aging Studies University of Maryland Baltimore USA

5. World Federation of Hemophilia Montreal Canada

6. BioMarin Pharmaceuticals Ltd London UK

7. CSL Behring King of Prussia USA

8. National Bleeding Disorders Foundation New York USA

9. Hemophilia and Thrombophilia Center, Rush Medical College Rush University Chicago USA

10. Department of Health Resource Methods Evidence, and Impact McMaster University Hamilton Canada

Abstract

AbstractIntroductionCurrently, no quality‐of‐life instrument exists that captures the full experience of the mental health outlook (MHO), a coreHEM core outcome, in people with haemophilia, including the potential transformational experience of receiving gene therapy.AimTo describe the methods used to develop a content validated patient‐reported outcome measure (PROM) that measures MHO for people with haemophilia.MethodsA conceptual framework, developed from a literature/evidence review, was used to create an interview guide and draft a questionnaire. Males aged 15 or older with severe/moderate haemophilia were eligible to participate in concept elicitation or cognitive debriefing interviews. The conceptual framework was refined based on a thematic analysis of concept elicitation interviews and PROM items were developed from the conceptual framework. Cognitive debriefing sessions that prioritised relevance and understanding of the PROM were held in two rounds; items were updated iteratively.ResultsA conceptual framework with five domains (stigma, anxiety, depression, life interference and identity) was constructed from over 300 identified MHO concepts. Fifty‐three participants took part in interviews. After 32 concept elicitation interviews, the framework was updated by including eight new sub‐concepts and eliminating two. Updates to the questionnaire included items added or removed and improved wording. The final coreHEM MHO PROM has 26 questions in two sections (general mental health associated with haemophilia, and a gene therapy section).ConclusionsThe instrument is content‐validated and can be used as an exploratory outcome. MHO scores can be measured and compared to give more insight into patient quality of life.

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3