Efficacy and safety of olorinab, a full agonist of the cannabinoid receptor 2, for the treatment of abdominal pain in patients with irritable bowel syndrome: Results from a phase 2b randomized placebo‐controlled trial (CAPTIVATE)

Author:

Chang Lin1ORCID,Cash Brooks D.2,Lembo Anthony3ORCID,Kunkel David C.4,English Brett A.5,Lindstrom Beatriz5,Gu Guibao5,Skare Sharon5,Gilder Kye5,Turner Stewart5,Cataldi Fabio5,Lipkis Donald6,Tack Jan7

Affiliation:

1. David Geffen School of Medicine UCLA Los Angeles California USA

2. University of Texas Health Science Center Houston Houston Texas USA

3. Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Boston Massachusetts USA

4. University of California San Diego La Jolla California USA

5. Arena Pharmaceuticals, Inc. San Diego California USA

6. Sharp Grossmont Hospital San Diego California USA

7. University Hospitals Leuven Leuven Belgium

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundOlorinab is a highly selective, peripherally acting, full agonist of cannabinoid receptor 2. This study assessed the efficacy and safety of olorinab to treat abdominal pain in patients with irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea (IBS‐D) and constipation (IBS‐C).MethodsCAPTIVATE was a phase 2b, randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, parallel‐group trial. Eligible participants aged 18–70 years with IBS‐C and IBS‐D diagnosed per Rome IV received olorinab 10 mg, 25 mg, or 50 mg three times daily (TID) or placebo TID for 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was the change in patient‐reported average abdominal pain score (AAPS) from baseline to Week 12.Key ResultsA total of 273 participants were randomized to receive olorinab 10 mg (n = 67), olorinab 25 mg (n = 67), olorinab 50 mg (n = 69), or placebo (n = 70). Although a treatment response was observed across all groups, the weekly change in average AAPS from baseline to Week 12 was not significantly different between placebo and any olorinab dose. In a prespecified subgroup analysis of participants with a baseline AAPS ≥6.5, olorinab 50 mg (n = 35) significantly improved AAPS compared with placebo (n = 30) (p = 0.014). Adverse event rates were comparable between olorinab and placebo and there were no reported serious adverse events or deaths.Conclusion and InferencesAlthough olorinab was well‐tolerated and improved weekly AAPS, the primary endpoint was not met. However, in participants with moderate‐to‐severe pain at baseline (AAPS ≥6.5), olorinab 50 mg significantly improved weekly AAPS compared with placebo. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04043455.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Gastroenterology,Endocrine and Autonomic Systems,Physiology

Cited by 8 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3