Enhancing probiotic encapsulation with konjac glucomannan hydrolysate

Author:

Phumsombat Putthapong12ORCID,Lekhavat Supaporn3ORCID,Devahastin Sakamon45ORCID,Chiewchan Naphaporn4ORCID,Borompichaichartkul Chaleeda16ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Food Technology, Faculty of Science Chulalongkorn University Phayathai Road, Patumwan Bangkok 10330 Thailand

2. School of Food Industry King Mongkut's Institute of Technology Ladkrabang 1 Chalong Krung, Lat Krabang Bangkok 10520 Thailand

3. Expert Center of Innovative Health Food Thailand Institute of Scientific and Technological Research 35 Mu 3 Technopolis, Khlong Ha Khlong Luang 12120 Pathum Thani Thailand

4. Advanced Food Processing Research Laboratory, Department of Food Engineering, Faculty of Engineering King Mongkut's University of Technology Thonburi 126 Pracha Uthit Road, Tung Khru Bangkok 10140 Thailand

5. The Academy of Science The Royal Society of Thailand Dusit, Bangkok 10300 Thailand

6. Multi‐Omics for Functional Products in Food, Cosmetics and Animals, ResearchUnit Bangkok Thailand

Abstract

SummaryFeasibility of using konjac glucomannan hydrolysate (KGMH) as prebiotics and wall material for encapsulating probiotics was investigated. Prebiotic activity scores (PASs) were determined for KGMH, inulin, fructooligosaccharides and konjac glucomannan to assess their effectiveness in promoting growth of probiotics and inhibiting enteric mixture. Thermal tolerances of probiotics were also assessed. Lactobacillus rhamnosus L34 and L. acidophilus LA5 exhibited higher PASs and thermal tolerances and were selected for encapsulation; freeze drying and spray drying were used to form and dry encapsulated probiotics. Maltodextrin (MD), soy protein isolate (SPI) and KGMH, either individually or in combination, were comparatively used as wall materials. Freeze drying with SPI and KGMH resulted in highest survival rates for L. rhamnosus L34 (97.92%) and L. acidophilus LA5 (88.94%). In case of spray drying, MD, KGMH and combination of MD and KGMH resulted in drying yields of 55–71%; SPI‐containing formula resulted in lower yields (20–23%). Spray‐dried probiotics exhibited lower survival rates compared to their freeze‐dried counterpart. KGMH, particularly in combination with SPI, emerged as promising material for enhancing probiotics survival during encapsulation.

Funder

National Science and Technology Development Agency

Thailand Institute of Scientific and Technological Research

Publisher

Wiley

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Characterisation of chicken breast and soy proteins glycated with konjac glucomannan hydrolysate;International Journal of Food Science & Technology;2024-09-08

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3