Long‐term outcomes in COVID‐19 patients admitted to intensive care in Denmark: A nationwide observational study

Author:

Meier Nick1ORCID,Perner Anders1,Plovsing Ronni2ORCID,Christensen Steffen3,Poulsen Lone M.4,Brøchner Anne C.5,Rasmussen Bodil S.6ORCID,Helleberg Marie7,Jensen Jens U. S.8,Andersen Lars P. K.9ORCID,Siegel Hanna10,Ibsen Michael11,Jørgensen Vibeke L.12,Winding Robert13,Iversen Susanne14,Pedersen Henrik P.15,Sølling Christoffer16,Garcia Ricardo S.17ORCID,Michelsen Jens18,Mohr Thomas10,Michagin George19,Espelund Ulrick S.20,Bundgaard Helle21,Kirkegaard Lynge22,Smitt Margit23,Sigurdsson Sigurdur24,Buck David L.25,Ribergaard Niels‐Erik26,Pedersen Helle S.27,Toft Mette Helene28,Jonassen Trine B.2,Mølgaard Nielsen Frederik6ORCID,Madsen Emilie K.3,Haberlandt Trine N.5,Bredahl Louise Sophie26,Haase Nicolai1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Intensive Care Rigshospitalet Copenhagen Denmark

2. Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Hvidovre Hospital Copenhagen Denmark

3. Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Århus University Hospital Århus Denmark

4. Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Zealand University Hospital Køge Denmark

5. Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Kolding Hospital University Hospital of Southern Denmark Denmark

6. Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Ålborg University Hospital Ålborg Denmark

7. Department of Infectious Diseases Rigshospitalet Copenhagen Denmark

8. Department of Respiratory Medicine Herlev‐Gentofte Hospital Copenhagen Denmark

9. Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Bispebjerg Hospital Copenhagen Denmark

10. Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Herlev‐Gentofte Hospital Copenhagen Denmark

11. Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care North Zealand Hospital Hillerød Denmark

12. Department of Cardiothoracic Anaesthesiology Rigshospitalet Copenhagen Denmark

13. Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Herning Hospital Herning Denmark

14. Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Slagelse Hospital Slagelse Denmark

15. Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Zealand University Hospital Roskilde Denmark

16. Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Viborg Hospital Viborg Denmark

17. Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Esbjerg Hospital Esbjerg Denmark

18. Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Odense University Hospital Odense Denmark

19. Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Svendborg Hospital Svendborg Denmark

20. Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Horsens Hospital Horsens Denmark

21. Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Randers Hospital Randers Denmark

22. Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Åbenrå Hospital Åbenrå Denmark

23. Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Glostrup Hospital Copenhagen Denmark

24. Department of Neuroanaesthesiology Rigshospitalet Copenhagen Denmark

25. Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Holbæk Hospital Holbæk Denmark

26. Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Hjørring Hospital Hjørring Denmark

27. Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Nykøbing Falster Hospital Nykøbing Falster Denmark

28. Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Bornholms Hospital Rønne Denmark

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundAmong ICU patients with COVID‐19, it is largely unknown how the overall outcome and resource use have changed with time, different genetic variants, and vaccination status.MethodsFor all Danish ICU patients with COVID‐19 from March 10, 2020 to March 31, 2022, we manually retrieved data on demographics, comorbidities, vaccination status, use of life support, length of stay, and vital status from medical records. We compared patients based on the period of admittance and vaccination status and described changes in epidemiology related to the Omicron variant.ResultsAmong all 2167 ICU patients with COVID‐19, 327 were admitted during the first (March 10–19, 2020), 1053 during the second (May 20, 2020 to June 30, 2021) and 787 during the third wave (July 1, 2021 to March 31, 2022). We observed changes over the three waves in age (median 72 vs. 68 vs. 65 years), use of invasive mechanical ventilation (81% vs. 58% vs. 51%), renal replacement therapy (26% vs. 13% vs. 12%), extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (7% vs. 3% vs. 2%), duration of invasive mechanical ventilation (median 13 vs. 13 vs. 9 days) and ICU length of stay (median 13 vs. 10 vs. 7 days). Despite these changes, 90‐day mortality remained constant (36% vs. 35% vs. 33%). Vaccination rates among ICU patients were 42% as compared to 80% in society. Unvaccinated versus vaccinated patients were younger (median 57 vs. 73 years), had less comorbidity (50% vs. 78%), and had lower 90‐day mortality (29% vs. 51%). Patient characteristics changed significantly after the Omicron variant became dominant including a decrease in the use of COVID‐specific pharmacological agents from 95% to 69%.ConclusionsIn Danish ICUs, the use of life support declined, while mortality seemed unchanged throughout the three waves of COVID‐19. Vaccination rates were lower among ICU patients than in society, but the selected group of vaccinated patients admitted to the ICU still had very severe disease courses. When the Omicron variant became dominant a lower fraction of SARS‐CoV‐2 positive patients received COVID treatment indicating other causes for ICU admission.

Funder

Statens Serum Institut

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine,General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3