Author:
Gerbo Laurence,Leinfelder KarlF.,Mueninghoff Leonard,Russell Carl
Abstract
The results of a long‐term clinical study of a posterior composite resin are reevaluated using the Moffa‐Lugassy, the Vivadent, and the Leinfelder‐Goldberg standards. Occlusion (ICI/Coe, England) was selected for the study, and the results obtained from three universities are compared. From these results, it is concluded that all posterior composite resins should be evaluated using the same optical standards.
Reference14 articles.
1. BowenRL.Dental filling material comprising vinyl silane treated fused silica and a binder consisting of a reaction product of Bisphenol and Glycidyl Methacrylate.1962; U.S. Patent No. 3 066 112.
2. A Simple Method of Increasing the Adhesion of Acrylic Filling Materials to Enamel Surfaces
3. Posterior composite resins: a clinical evaluation;Leinfelder KF.;J Gen Dent,1983
4. One-year observations on a composite resin for Class II restorations
Cited by
19 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献