The effects of transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation delivered with and without high‐frequency modulation on spinal and corticospinal excitability

Author:

Massey Sarah12ORCID,Konig Danielle1,Upadhyay Pratham1,Evcil Zehra Beril1,Melin Rebbekha1ORCID,Fatima Memoona1,Hannah Ricci3ORCID,Duffell Lynsey12ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Medical Physics & Biomedical Engineering University College London London UK

2. Aspire Centre for Rehabilitation Engineering and Assistive Technology UCL Institute of Orthopaedics and Musculoskeletal Sciences, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital London UK

3. Centre for Human and Applied Physiological Sciences Kings College London London UK

Abstract

AbstractTranscutaneous spinal cord stimulation (TSCS) has been shown to improve motor recovery in people with spinal cord injury (SCI). Some groups deliver TSCS modulated with a kHz‐frequency (TSCS–kHz); the intensity used for TSCS–kHz is usually set based on the motor threshold for TSCS, even though TSCS–kHz threshold is considerably higher than TSCS. As a result, TSCS–kHz interventions tend to be delivered at low intensities with respect to the motor threshold (~40%). In this study, we compared the effects of sub‐threshold TSCS and TSCS–kHz, when delivered at similar intensity relative to their own motor threshold. Experiment I compared the after‐effects of 20 min of sub‐threshold (40% threshold) TSCS and TSCS–kHz on spinal and corticospinal excitability in able‐bodied participants. Experiment II assessed the dose–response relationship of delivering short (10‐pulse) trains of TSCS and TSCS–kHz at three different current intensities relative to the threshold (40%, 60%, and 80%). Experiment I found that 20 min of TSCS–kHz at a 40% threshold decreased posterior root reflex amplitude (p < 0.05), whereas TSCS did not. In experiment II, motor‐evoked potential (MEP) amplitude increased following short trains of TSCS and TSCS–kHz of increasing intensity. MEP amplitude was significantly greater for TSCS–kHz compared with TSCS when delivered at 80% of the threshold (p < 0.05). These results suggest that TSCS and TSCS–kHz have different effects when delivered at similar intensity relative to their own threshold; both for immediate effects on corticospinal excitability and following prolonged stimulation on spinal excitability. These different effects may be utilized for optimal rehabilitation in people with SCI.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Biomedical Engineering,General Medicine,Biomaterials,Medicine (miscellaneous),Bioengineering

Reference36 articles.

1. The effects of adding transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (TSCS) to sit‐to‐stand training in people with spinal cord injury: a pilot study;Al'joboori Y;J Clin Med,2020

2. Targeted neurotechnology restores walking in humans with spinal cord injury;Wagner FB;Nature,2018

3. Recovery of over‐ground walking after chronic motor complete spinal cord injury;Angeli CA;N Engl J Med,2018

4. Epidural spinal cord stimulation facilitates immediate restoration of dormant motor and autonomic Supraspinal pathways after chronic neurologically complete spinal cord injury;Darrow D;J Neurotrauma,2019

5. Priming neural circuits to modulate spinal reflex excitability;Estes SP;Front Neurol,2017

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3