Ejaculatory function following transperineal laser ablation vs TURP for benign prostatic obstruction: a randomized trial

Author:

Bertolo Riccardo1ORCID,Iacovelli Valerio1ORCID,Cipriani Chiara1ORCID,Carilli Marco1,Vittori Matteo1,Antonucci Michele1,Maiorino Francesco1,Signoretti Marta12,Petta Filomena1,Travaglia Stefano1,Panei Massimo1,Bove Pierluigi13

Affiliation:

1. Department of Urology San Carlo di Nancy Hospital Rome Italy

2. Department of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, Urology Unit University of L'Aquila Coppito Italy

3. Urology Unit, Department of Surgery Tor Vergata University of Rome Rome Italy

Abstract

ObjectivesTo evaluate the reliability of transperineal interstitial laser ablation of the prostate (TPLA) in preserving antegrade ejaculation compared to transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP).Patients and MethodsIn this single‐centre, prospective, randomized, open‐label study, consecutive patients with indication for surgical treatment for benign prostatic obstruction (BPO) were enrolled between January 2020 and September 2021 (NCT04781049). Patients were randomized to one of two treatment arms: Group A: TPLA (experimental group) and Group B: TURP (reference standard group). The primary endpoint was change in ejaculatory function (assessed by the Male Sexual Health Questionnaire – Ejaculatory function domain [EJ‐MSHQ]) at 1 month after surgery. Secondary endpoints included comparison of visual analogue scale (VAS) scores, changes in sexual function (assessed using the five‐item International Index of Erectile Function [IIEF‐5]), change in International Prostate Symptom Score [IPSS], change in quality of life score, and maximum urinary flow rate [Qmax] improvement at 1–6 months, as appropriate.ResultsFifty‐one patients (26 TPLA vs 25 TURP) were analysed. No differences in the perception of pain assessed by VAS and no differences in IIEF‐5 score were found between the groups. The distribution of ejaculatory function assessed by the EJ‐MSHQ remained unmodified after TPLA (P = 0.2), while a median 30% decrease in EJ‐MSHQ score was observed after TURP (P = 0.01). Absence of antegrade ejaculation was reported in one patient in the TPLA group (vs 18 patients in the TURP group). A statistically significant difference between the treatment groups was found in terms of postoperative Qmax (TPLA vs TURP: 15.2 [interquartile range 13.5–18.3] mL/s vs 26.0 [interquartile range 22.0–48.0] mL/s; P < 0.001). Both treatments significantly improved Qmax, with a mean 23.9 mL/s improvement after TURP (95% confidence interval [CI] 17.1–30.7) vs 6.0 mL/s after TPLA (95% CI 5.0–7.0), and IPSS, with a mean decrease of 11.6 (95% CI 9.7–13.5) vs 5.8 after TPLA (95% CI.2–9.6) with respect to baseline.ConclusionIn our study, TPLA preserved ejaculatory function in 96% of cases in addition to providing significant relief from BPO.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Urology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3