Affiliation:
1. Division of Theory and Practice of Sports and Fields of Physical Activity, BaySpo‐Bayreuth Center of Sport Science University of Bayreuth Bayreuth Germany
2. Division of Exercise Physiology and Metabolism, BaySpo‐Bayreuth Center of Sport Science University of Bayreuth Bayreuth Germany
3. Department of Physiology and Pathophysiology Medical University of Graz Graz Austria
4. Interdisciplinary Metabolic Medicine Trials Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Endocrinology and Diabetology Medical University of Graz Graz Austria
Abstract
AbstractAimsTo investigate how a change in body position with light‐intensity physical activity (PA) ‘snacks’ (LIPAS, alternate sitting and standing, walking or standing continuously) compared with uninterrupted prolonged sitting affects glucose metabolism and heart rate variability (HRV) parameters in young adults with overweight and obesity.Materials and MethodsWe conducted a four‐arm randomized controlled crossover trial. The following conditions were tested during an 8‐h simulated workday: uninterrupted prolonged sitting (SIT), alternate sitting and standing (SIT‐STAND; 2.5 h total), continuous standing (STAND), and continuous walking (1.0 mph; WALK). The primary outcome was to investigate how a change in body position (alternate sitting and standing, walking or standing continuously) compared with uninterrupted sitting affects mean 8‐h glucose metabolism. Secondary outcomes included the effects on 2‐h postprandial glucose concentrations, as well as on 8‐h/24‐h heart rate and HRV parameters, in the respective study arms. Capillary blood samples were drawn from an hyperemised earlobe in the fasted state and once every hour during each trial intervention by puncturing the earlobe with a lancet and collecting 20 μL of blood (Biosen S‐Line Lab+; EKF diagnostics, Barleben, Germany). HRV was assessed for 24 h including the 8‐h intervention phase, and a home phase by means of a Holter electrocardiogram. All participants received the same standardized non‐relativised breakfast and lunch during the four trial visits.ResultsSeventeen individuals (eight women, mean age 23.4 ± 3.3 years, body mass index 29.7 ± 3.8 kg/m2, glycated haemoglobin level 34.8 ± 3.1 mmol/mol [5.4 ± 0.3%], body fat 31.8 ± 8.2%) completed all four trial arms. Compared with SIT (89.4 ± 6.8 mg/dL), 8‐h mean glucose was lower in all other conditions (p < 0.05) and this was statistically significant compared with WALK (86.3 ± 5.2 mg/dL; p = 0.034). Two‐hour postprandial glucose after breakfast was approximately 7% lower for WALK compared with SIT (p = 0.002). Furthermore, significant time × condition effects on HRV parameters favouring light‐intensity walking were observed (p < 0.001).ConclusionsReplacement and interruption of prolonged sitting with light‐intensity walking showed a significant blood glucose‐lowering effect and improved HRV during an 8‐h work environment in young adults with overweight and obesity.
Reference49 articles.
1. Sedentary Behavior Research Network (SBRN) – Terminology Consensus Project process and outcome
2. Combined relationship of physical inactivity and sedentary behavior with the prevalence of noncommunicable chronic diseases: data from 52,675 Brazilian adults and elderly;Bertuol C;Eur J Sport Sci,2021
3. Sitting Time, Physical Activity, and Risk of Mortality in Adults
4. A tale of two pandemics: How will COVID-19 and global trends in physical inactivity and sedentary behavior affect one another?
5. Too much sitting and metabolic risk—has modern technology caught up with us?;Dunstan DW;Eur Endocrinol,2010